I don’t think the case for Cygnus being town is that compelling. As I’ve already mentioned, the unvote for septimus isn’t strong evidence. If Cygnus was a wolf, he knew he was simply choosing to mis-lynch a different townie. Leaving the power role alive has some risk, but look at the results. Nobody has questioned that Cygnus is townie since then. The Sario vote is a more compelling case, IMO, but it’s not iron clad. There were plenty of places for a wolf to place a third vote and mis-lynch a townie (PCM, Plum). Sangfroid is an unknown. Of the five people with 2 or 3 votes at the end of the day (meaning they could have been lynched with the change of a single vote), two were wolves (Sario, Diggit). So Cygnus either was one of three townies that voted for Sario, or Cygnus bussed Sario and gets the wolf MVP for two moves that are easily misread as super townie.
Briefly, I’m not sure what to make of Sario’s early vote on Cygnus. Nobody was thinking Cygnus was wolf in the game thread, but Sario threw a vote that way when he already had three on him. Maybe this is a move of a dying wolf to put a harmless vote on a fellow wolf to lower suspicion. That vote couldn’t go to Diggit because he already had two votes, but it could have gone to Johnny as well. At the time, there wasn’t much voiced suspicion of Johnny either, so voting for either would have accomplished that goal.
Nonsuch seems like he’s been at the low end of the likely candidates list for a long time. Based on sangfroid’s post summarizing the voting record of each candidate, he can’t find a wolf to save it life and it’s catching up with him. What I don’t understand is the origin of the case against him.
sangfroid is a strange case. His position in the Sario mess is the most interesting element in any case against him, but it’s virtually impossible to read. He was the winner of the tiebreaker. Of all the people with two votes, Sario chose him to put his vote on and tied the vote up between the two of them. If sangfroid is town, this vote could have either been an attempt by Sario to kill a townie in a mis-lynch, which relies on the mason not being one of those voting for Sario. The problem with this interpretation is that it’s not a particularly good plan. If sang is town, that means that the wolves know that 3 of 9 remaining townies are voting Sario, which yields a decent chance the mason breaks the tie to kill the alpha rather than the alpha breaking the tie to kill sang. Obviously, this is what happened. (Of course, Cygnus could be a wolf, which lessens the risk of this plan, which nudges my suspicions that the swan is truly a wolf slightly up, but only a tiny amount.)
If sang is wolf, things make a little more sense. The simple explanation for Sario’s actions is that he was bussing another wolf. If the mason broke the tie to kill Sario, sang looks a little townier due to the fact that a wolf nearly killed him. If sang dies and turns up wolf, Sario looks townie for being in on a townie kill. As far as suspicions go, it’s win-win, but it costs them a wolf.
Finally, sang’s vote on TexCat is difficult to explain under any scenario. It’s a throw-away vote. There were three people with two votes on them at the time already. While it was possible that Tex was the alpha, that was a relatively small risk.
Going in to rereading the mess that was the end of Day 4, I was leaning Nonsuch. Now, he’s on the bottom of my list, even below Cygnus. My gut is even saying Cygnus is the last wolf and has benefited from elaborate and noble wolf self sacrifices to survive so long and be so unquestionably town. But that’s unlikely. The elaborate schemes that would have to happen to make that true aren’t reasonable. As others have said already, town tends to come up with much more elaborate wolf schemes than the wolves themselves. The last wolf is sangfroid. I say this with the same confidence I had that PCM was the last wolf.