Man Caught Walking Into New York Cathedral With Full Gas Cans, Lighters

Clearly, to some people, the news about the fire at Notre Dame starts them thinking “You know, that’s not a bad idea.”

Two full cans of gasoline, lighter fluid, and matches? He obviously wasn’t trying for subtle.

I don’t think he would have been able to start a Notre-Dame-like fire, but he certainly could have seriously damaged one of the floor-level “chapels” within.

The best part:

A philosophy professor???

There’s a story in here.

Feh, Americans. Aaaalways with the remakes. Can’t you produce anything original ?!

Yeah. And the Unabomber was mathematics professor at one point. I read somewhere (don’t know if it’s true or not) that “engineer” was the most profession of terrorists these days. You think the commies killed the intelligentisia just for the yucks?

Since race and religion haven’t been mentioned I’m assuming he’s bog-standard white America male of Christian background even if maybe (total speculation here) he has atheist inclinations himself?

It’d make sense. You think it’s easy to blow things up right? It takes planning and calculation.
But he wasn’t an engineer – he was a philosopher. That’s whole different ball game. an engineer would’ve built a cleverly concealed, intricately working fire device to take into the cathedral with him. It looks like this guy stopped at Home Depot on his way to the church and just brought in the stuff as he bought it. It’s surprising that he remembered the matches. It would have been embarrassing if he had to borrow a lighter.

Let’s see…the man was known to police, was carrying two cans of gasoline, lighter fluid and lighters, told the cops his car was out of gas (it wasn’t) and went into the church right after another famous church had had a fire.

Professor or not, not the brightest person in the bunch.

ETA:

He needed a better cover story. Like: I was planning a cross country trip and I wanted to get this gas blessed for the start of the journey.

Googling his name brings up some interesting information, including a published book on philosophy at amazon: marc lamparello - Google Search

Interesting that police officers were already stationed just out the church.

I guess they anticipated someone might attack this NY landmark after Notre Dame?

Article says a little gas spilled. That shouldn’t happen if the caps on the cans are screwed tight. This guy was ready to pour it out quickly.

That’s part of the reason. Also, it is Holy Week and NYC landmarks are routinely patrolled in his Age of Terrorism.

Here’s his book: https://www.amazon.com/Reason-Counterpoint-Marc-Lamparello-ebook/dp/B01MG068JU/ref=sr_1_fkmrnull_1?keywords=marc+lamparello&qid=1555599912&s=books&sr=1-1-fkmrnull

Just the one book, although he was planning to do two more.

Heh. Check out “Rate my professor” at Brooklyn College. Of the 14 ratings, six were from before today and are all “Awesome.” Ones from today:

In NYC it’s almost routine to see ESU (ie. SWAT) officers standing around with M-16/AR-15 rifles & ballistic helmets in front of certain iconic/touristy spots.

Penn Station not only has NYPD & the multiple transit agency PD officers but armed military personal on patrol/observation duty.

Did he have a cover story for the lighter fluid and matches?

Why did he need both gasoline and lighter fluid?

I don’t know what reason he gave, but gasoline is notoriously more difficult to light than you’d think.* Lighter fluid does light easily, and may have been intended to help get the gasoline started.

So you mean all those movies where a flicked cigarette instantly causes a pool of gasoline to explode in giant flames are inaccurate?!:eek:

It’s not quite that bad, but studies do show that engineers are lopsidedly represented among terrorists.

As for why, one theory I’ve heard is that since engineering is all about *how *to do things rather than what or why, it disproportionately attracts intellectually inclined people who don’t want to question their own beliefs.

From the New York Times:

*"At least one of the courses he has taught, Introduction to the Problems of Philosophy, touched on the idea of religion.

The course included “such topics as the nature and scope of knowledge, meaning and verification, the existence of God, determinism and free will, the mind-body problem, and the nature of moral judgments,” according to an online course description for Brooklyn College."*

“My mind said no no no, but my body went and did it anyway.”

Should be a workable defense.

The Rate My Professors comments are a hoot. Marc Lamparello at Brooklyn College | Rate My Professors

With the news stories of the past week, is anyone else suffering from this earworm?

Quoted in post #11.