While IANALawyer, it sounds like this ruling has already decided this:
I interpret this to mean that if Zimmerman wants out again, he will have to appeal a decision that’s already been made. As I understand these things, that means the bar to him getting bail is now considerably higher than it was set before.
To me, the most interesting tidbit in that order is that, when enumerating the points for and against setting bond, Judge Lester opined that “the evidence against him is strong,” referring to the consideration of “the character and strength of the evidence or the probability of guilt.”
I’m wondering whether this judge’s determination that Zimmerman’s wife lied can be used against her at trial should she end up being charged with perjury because of her testimony.
No. The judge’s determination that the matter was material can be admitted into evidence, but the question of whether she lied is one of ultimate fact for the jury to decide.
I wonder if we’re going to see a plea bargain from Zimmerman in the next few days or weeks. Now they can use the charge against his wife to squeeze him – offer to drop charges against her if he pleads guilty, probably to some lesser charge than murder 2.
Ah, there is such a thing. But according to this site, her perjury in a court procedure automatically makes it a 3rd degree felony with a possible penalty of 5 years in prison.
Not necessarily. No bail orders are always subject to modification, but in my opinion, Zimmerman screwed himself trying to be cute with this judge, and the judge now has every reason to keep him locked up until trial.