Maybe a dingo ate your baby

ETF, I am certainly no apologist for anyone on this board who is apt to be a jerk, and I too have the odd scuffle with Lib over the years, but your post above is just arseholish in the extreme.

I personally feel that Liberal has behaved with restraint in this thread that has been fucking littered with mud-slingers, people seeking to blow their own ‘Aren’t I Wonderful I Have Cats’ trumpet, shitheads in general (including troll/s) and reading comprehension-impaired morons.

And being a seer of such wonderful psychic ability, able to pre-determine Lib’s future on the board with such conviction, I wonder if you should look at taking up a new career in Fortune Telling!! You’d make a million. :rolleyes:

Ah… okay. I’ll try to answer your questions. Let me know if this helps.

[

No, I didn’t, and no, I didn’t. I glanced at the MPSIMs thread- there were only a couple of relevant posts there that pertained to my post (Boscibo’s, Lynn’s, and Liberal’s three). As for the rest of the information, it’s easy enough to see someone’s posting history- just click on the name and go to “view all posts.” Takes all of… well, on my piss-poor dialup connection, about a minute for the information to come up.

While it may seem odd to do such a thing, I used this information twice for very specific reasons- once in post #166 to refute his assertion that he doesn’t have time to post a “saga,” and once in post #196, to refute his assertion that he hadn’t been able to reply to Boscibo’s post in MPSIMs because he was sleeping. Why? ::shrug:: He’d spent the whole thread weaseling out of short questions like post #2; I figured he may feel a bit more comfortable with a length he was more accustomed to.

No, I certainly don’t think such a thing. I explained what I meant by bait in post #196, but here’s the exact quote:

It is my opinion that Liberal baited Boscibo by 1) intentionally ignoring the mod’s ruling, and 2) replying not with clarification but with a throw-away line that is designed to have the original poster go “WTF?”

I suggested that taking it to email would have been a less divisive, probably significantly more productive way to deal with Liberal’s primary objection, which (it seemed) was a combination of the smearing of his daughter and his reluctance to share personal details of the situation. He certainly doesn’t HAVE to take it to email, but since- as you pointed out- this is a messageboard, he should also be prepared for folks maybe not having the best opinion of the situation.

I’m trying, and failing, to think of a good analogy. My point regarding the email thing is this: If Liberal is sensitive about how people perceive his daughter, and if he sees that a situation regarding her has the potential to escalate into a place he is not prepared to go, then the simplest course of action is to stop his side of it. By taking it to email, he could address his concerns in a way that respects his daughter’s reputation and his privacy.

Plus I can’t follow a line of thinking that goes something like “I hate, hate, hate it when people paint my daughter out to be a monster. It makes me go blind with rage. I’m going to post a thread that invites lots more people to make terrible assumptions and accusations. It’s a good day to burst a blood vessel, I think.”

I obviously can’t speak for anyone else in this thread. My issues are as follows:

  • Liberal, after a mod ruling, persisted in hijacking a MPSIMS thread. Whether his initial post can be considered thread-shitting is up to other people to decide.
  • After hijacking the thread, he posted this Pit thread in which he accused “people” of slandering (my word, don’t misinterpret) his daughter and of being “fucking half-witted troglodyte(s).”
  • Now, that is certainly his right, but what he doesn’t seem to understand is that by posting the OP, as is his right, it is everyone else’s right to come in and question his and his daughter’s actions. Every response that isn’t supportive is seen as a direct personal attack on him, and his original concern- his daughter’s reputation- is becoming more and more tarnished.
  • Halfway through the thread he tosses out additional information. And not just any information, but information that (as I’ve pointed out a few times) would have ground the whole thread to a halt if we’d known it beforehand. The cat had problems. Well, shit- that changes things a bit.
  • When people point out “Well, shit, dude” he begins a campaign of name-calling, avoiding, and outright lying. When I pointed out that perhaps this whole thing could have been avoided with a few extra words, he completely ignores the entirety of the post and accuses me (later) of witch-hunting.
  • His new crime is, in essence and as far as I am concerned, the same as the one he started with. He lies and intentionally misleads/misinterprets in order to engage in a campaign of name-calling and martyrdom.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to bed so I can muster up the energy to go to work tomorrow. Thank you, Caridwen, for asking me for clarification.

I disagree. Liberal brought all this on himself. I questioned something he had posted, he takes that as a personal attack by me on his daughter, and he starts this whole shitstorm Pit thread.

What if Liberal started a pit thread and no one came and posted anything? Is that what he wanted and expected?

Lib, I was all ready to welcome you back here; I appreciate your intellect, but this is pretty stupid, and beneath what I’ve thought of you.

For the topic at hand; I was raised with cats from the git go. When my parents got a cat subsequent with my birth, my Dad’s mom was aghast, and said the cat would “suck my breath out”. The cat, Cinnamon, slept with me from six months on in my crib, til he passed when I was 11 years old. Mom watched to see if it was a bad thing. My early memories are having a furry heartbeat right there always, and soft fur to hang on to. Never had any disease issues with this, rather, it was the very best influence of bonding with other species from the git-go, and fostering an understanding of connection with creatures beyond oneself. It wasn’t nasty and dirty, it was understanding the world beyond Human. I am very grateful for that understanding, and it has held in good stead. I am not afraid of the real/natural world. I had cats in my cradle, and their purrs have added greatly to my perception of the world.

There ya go, Lib.

Ah, and one more thing before I go, because I forgot it earlier:

Boscibo, as one girl to another I apologize for any mistake I made in assigning gender-based pronouns to you. :slight_smile:

Oh, most certainly, Liberal did start this pit thread, and people have been vehement in their attacks (and sometimes support) of his stance. That is not what I was saying (see my reference to comprehension-impaired morons above).

Would you like to try again? Should I make the words littler for you? :rolleyes:

How can you call how he has responded restrained? Name calling is restrained?

Amen.

‘Liar’ and ‘Stupid’ are harsh?

Fuckmedead. You really ARE a moron!!

:smiley:

Cock Sucking Whore isn’t harsh?

I notice you like calling names too. What a nice way to argue! So sophisticated!

So “fucking half-witted troglodyte” in the OP isn’t? No wonder you’re tonguing Lib’s arsehole. :rolleyes:

And it isn’t the names themselves that offend me, but when your argument dissolves into name calling you’ve pretty much lost any credibility you ever had.

It’s doing stuff seventh graders resort to when they can’t think of anything else to say. But I’m sure you already knew that since you’re so smart and all.

If you’d like to read back over the thread where Lib conjectured about your professional oral capabilities, you will see that it is in direct response to an equally wild conjecture on your part: in other words, he was throwing it back atcha (with extra abandon, I’ll admit). You conveniently left off the ‘who knows’ part of his original quote, which, yaknow, does sort of change the whole meaning of the exchange somewhat.

Nah, I’m really trolling the bottom at the moment. Normally I pull my sleeves up and deck people who argue with me. Much easier that way, and all the scars on my knuckles add to my street-cred.

:smiley:

Well, all I can say after this multi-page bullshit thread, is Lib is back, shitting in threads and making it all about Liberal.
Can’t believe you stayed away for so long, considering your apparent need for SDMB validation.

How long will you last this time?

Speaking of reading comprehension disabilities, it wasn’t me Liberal called a cock sucking whore. That was Beaucreana he was speculating about.

No, you apparently can’t “do the math”. A month’s worth of cigarettes is only $30.00? Only $1/Day? On what planet and in what year? Mars, 1962?

Liberal said she did everything she could, what reason do you have for not taking him at his word? I do.

What does smoking have to do with the cat?

No one said you didn’t. But this isn’t “happy thread” MPSIMS, here in the Pit, I may counter and argue with you, not that it is worth arguing with an undeservedly self-righteous, hypocritical, dipshit like yourself.

:smack:

Meh, it was the B that got me!! And anyway, you spelled Beaucarnea wrong too! Gaudere’s Law strikes again.

:wink:

Hypo-: Prefix meaning “low, under, beneath, down, below normal”

So you are criticizing me for not being critical enough? I’m sorry. I will try harder next time.

Burn, you got me there. :rolleyes:

Hey, look over there–kitty pics! Ooh, shiny…

Gotta give it to you Liberal. When you start a Pit thread, even if it is about fucken cats of all things, you certainly bring the loons outta the woodwork for a party.

Oh, and welcome back by the way. :smiley: