Men: Why are you paying for the date? Women: Why do you accept it?

Inspired by this thread, where **Shagnasty **is sharing his experience of dating. My question is not directed to him but to dopers in general, so I talk about him in third person. He shares the following:

It seems to be common practice especially in the USA (?), but also not too unusual in my parts of the world, that the man is paying the bill when dating, because he is a man and she is a woman.

I honestly don’t understand why. The tradition – which we probably all are aware of – that the man pays the bill, is that for hundreds of years or more the man is self supporting and the woman is not. (Or is supposed to be etc.) She is either “payed for” by her father, or by her husband. She lacks an economy of her own and are thus unable to pay for herself. So if a man wants to show that he can provide for her, he has to cough up. She lacks the money to pay for her own bill (does not have a job, waiting for a man who has), and he also needs to show that he in fact can pay the bills, to be an attractive candidate and so on.

But obviously and thankfully that is not the case anymore. Most grown up women who are dating men have a job, many times with high salary. Back to the Shag man: “I have been going out with high-earning women for years … while paying … and it is usually very expensive.”
(I’m joking with the user name, it is in good faith, no insult intended and hope it is OK.)

For the life of me I don’t understand this. If I – a middle aged man with a good income – was dating a woman, a professional in some line of work or another, it wouldn’t occur to me to spontaneously pay for the dinner. *If *I payed for the dinner – because I’m a man – what I’m saying to her is:

“Of course, as a woman, you do not have an income. Therefore I pay, being a man, who provides.”

Isn’t that an insult to both of us?

I came to think of this specifically when I talked with a young man in my own country who told me about his internet dating, and even though this is Scandinavia and everything – he seemed to habitually paying for the dinner and the drinks!

I can understand that you do so occasionally for a friend or even under certain circumstances for a stranger, and of course you hold up the door for a woman (just like you do for a man), and so on, but paying for the date because you are a man, and accepting it because you a woman, as a standard routine… I honestly don’t get it.

There are two grown ups at the table, with jobs and money in their wallet (for the sake of the discussion), who are having a good time together. They can have sex, be polite to each other (being a gentleman) and try make the other feel good in every way. But if I on the first meeting treat you as a person who are unable to pay for the meal… that would make me feel as if I was insulting you. “Since you are a woman [reaching for the wallet]…”

How do you accept that, as a woman? Or do you?

There’s nothing wrong or insulting to offer to treat someone else to a dinner. The woman can say, “OK, but next time’s on me.”

If it’s someone I’m just getting to know, I’ll usually offer to pick up the check. The money’s not enough to really worry about, and I’d rather avoid any awkwardness about asking her to pay. If she offers to pay, or split the check, that’s fine too.

The way I see it, the person doing the inviting does the paying. Before I married, I’d invite men over for dinner, since often they seemed uncomfortable with me paying on a date. One time, I took 2 guys to the movies at once - long, silly story - and I picked up the tab.

Bear in mind, this dating happened in the 70s, up till '83 when I married, so it was a different time, but I was gainfully employed, occasionally making more than the guy I dated. But if I was dating today, I’d want to pay my share - it’s only fair!

For my first date with my soon-to-be husband, we met in a Starbucks. He got there first, had a coffee and was sitting at a table. When I walked in, he stood to greet me and then invited me to get myself a beverage. I did. I actually rather liked the lack of chivalry. It was refreshingly not condescending.

Now that we’re married of course, I let him pay most of the time until he complains and then I pay. It’s all kind of silly, though, since we have pooled finances. :smiley:

When my husband and I go out, I usually pay, meaning I pull out my credit card on our joint credit account. He doesn’t seem to care, and since I’m a more generous tipper, it works out for the server.

It’s a bit of a running joke when he says “I’ll buy dinner” and he uses the VISA to pay. :smiley:

This is called communication. If you like this woman and want to see her, again, you need to let her know this in as many ways as possible.

Seems like everything is more expensive for women: Clothes, make up, the expenses of being a single mother… Then they’re making 76 cents on the dollar compared to a man.

Jeesh! The least I could do is pay for the date.

I’m not sure it makes much sense anymore, but it is traditional.

I learned from my Dad to always offer to pay at all restaurant meals (both men, women, couples) He was quite insistent about it. I’m a little more flexible and will allow exceptions for people that insist on splitting or offer to pay “next time.”

The one doing the inviting should pay. It’s generally expected that men invite and women do not which is, on the whole, to women’s disadvantage. Unfortunately, the early parts of dating are often constrainingly gender-typed. If the outlay bothers you, invite them to something cheap/free like a museum, coffee & a walk through the park.

If I found myself dating a woman who, even after several dates, never invited me there would probably be some other reason I wouldn’t want to date her beyond the fact that I paid everytime. It would at least be a red flag that she’s always waiting for other people to take the initiative.

Yes, of course. But that is not the point and I think I pointed that out in my OP. It is OK to treat someone a dinner, even if she is a woman, but that is another discussion I think.

But is it your experience that she gets to pick it up before you to “avoid any awkardness”? Is it common, in your experience? Do you get a bit annoyed as time goes by that women always pick up the tab for you, as if you were unable to pay for yourself?

Thanks for sharing the experience. This it what I would suppose to be the “default”. And it is also my experience by and large. I’m thinking of a woman who asked me to the movies as a kind of a date I guess, and I said OK, and she paid for it. She didn’t have to, of course, but she wanted to, so well then – nice of you (man or woman).

As I said above, isn’t this sorta selbstklaar. You’re a grown up, got your own money, been to Starbucks before, and so on. – This is why I’m creating this thread, I don’t get the “man pays” “woman accepts” because he is a man and she is a woman, when both are adults with pay checks.

Naturally I understand the point of certain mating rituals and so forth, but how can certain rituals that did work 1954, or 1874, work today, or be accepted today, when they are so obviously out-dated and – at least to my mind – unattractive (because the implications of them)?

Is it called “communication”? Thanks for letting me know. How often are you on the other side of this “communication”?

So what you are saying is that you pay for the date because you assume you have more money than the woman you’re having a dinner with. – Couldn’t the female professional you’re eating with take that as sexist? She may not see herself as a woman who necessarily earn less than you because she buys make up. I’m exaggerating a bit to make my point, but couldn’t she – shouldn’t she – see that as an insult?

If I offer to pay, it’s because I really want to go out on a date with her; and if I’m on one of those dates, then I don’t care that she’s not paying – because, again, that’s a date that I really wanted to go on. Simplicity, y’know?

Well, I can only speak anecdotally, but I know for a fact that I’m making more money than most of the women I have dated. That’s just going by our respective job titles alone.

And even if we did have comparable job titles. Statistics say, she’s making 76 cents on every dollar that I make. Yes, that’s sexists, but that’s not my doing. If I had my say, women would be making the same as I am.

I did date a woman who I assumed was making more money than I was. I still paid on our first date because I was the one that invited.

Most of the guys I’ve dated, save for two I think, have been either jobless or “under employed” (poor). They had no problem letting me pay. It was kind of like - if I didn’t pay, we couldn’t go out and do anything.

One guy I dated, he was really really well off. I made sure I paid every so often anyway. It was…fine.

I don’t remember what the one normal guy with a normal job did. Maybe we didn’t go out much.

Anyway, I dunno what the answer is to “who should pay?” How much am I insulting the dude by paying and how much is he insulting me by paying and how much am I insulted and how much is he insulted and who is taking advantage of who?!

That’s one way in which being married is sooo much easier than dating. You just - pay!

I think **Shagnasty **has pointed out a few times that he doesn’t mind paying, he insists on paying, he wants to go out and have an amazing time. But it would seem that in retrospect that bothers him a lot more than he lets on. He has some very unique (hopefully unique) perspectives on dating, though…

I don’t do that “man pays the bill” shit. When I’m dating in the starting-out mode I expect equal involvement in the paying of bills and I do use that expectation as a bit of a filter, to be honest.

I am temporarily and situationally-specifically inclined to pay more than 50% of the incurred charges with my specific partners these specific days because sheer happenstance (and male social privilege, I strongly suspect) has caused all three of them to be rather stressed for disposable income at the moment, but that’s

• within ongoing relationships, not initial dating, although in a polyamorous context there’s less distinction between those than there might be for mono couples; and

• it isn’t an expectation that they, or I, have based on me having the boy-parts; in fact, it still varies quite a bit and it’s specific to the situation and has been different in the past and may be different in the future; and

•it gets modified substantially if we’re talking “real money”, i.e., the deployment of long-term savings as opposed to income, because I actually don’t have as much tucked away as two of the three of them do. So there are outings and entertainment opportunities where it’s understandable that they don’t want to eat up their retirement savings and investments but there are also discussions about long-range plans that are more akin to what they saved that stuff up for.

I don’t feel at all treated like a meal ticket or sugar daddy or whatever the term is. Nor would I be tolerant of that.

Your post has a few good points (so I’m snipping it ;)), but nonetheless say you happen to sit next to a guy at ball game and during the game you start to talk and before you know it you’re having a great time with the fellow, and he suggest you take a beer and a burger at the local sports bar after the game.

At the sports bar there’s no chance in hell you’d expect him to pay because he “invited” you. If he did, wouldn’t you after a few beers say, something like, weirdo, I am able to pay my own beers?

Translate this to a woman you met at an art gallery. “Hey, what about a drink?” you say.

My point is that who’s “inviting” is not the decisive factor.

The bill should obviously be split but taking gender pay gap into account. :stuck_out_tongue:

I’m not sure I remember a woman offering to pay on a first date. If she did, I’d offer to split. I met someone at a really casual place a while ago and I paid the bill and asked if she’d get the tip. If it’s someone I only see once, it’s not enough to worry about. If it’s someone I wind up dating, then I’m sure it’ll even out in the long run.[sup]*[/sup]

I’m lucky to not have had it be an issue for me; but I can see how it would be a sore point for some women. If it’s important for her to pay, or split the check, I understand. Let’s not get stuck with all the gender politics and roles and just find out if we like each other.

  • And just for the record, I’m not talking about a “I paid for dinner, now you have to put out” thing. I just think two people who like each other will look for nice things to do for each other, and not keep track.