I have a news citation, you have nothing. How am I lazy when I provide a cite?
I guess it’s hard to defend a hate movement built on distortions and falsehoods. Everything you post either doesn’t say what you claim, or can’t be cited, or isn’t evidence of institutional discrimination against men. Bleh, I’m done. I need a shower after talking to you.
Miss Elizabeth, I have the same feeling of needing to shower after reading that poster. I just want to thank you for your thoughtful writing and the time/effort you have put in on this issue.
thank you!!
Your “Waaah, I’m an oppressed white male!” posts have already been argued against by better posters than I in every one of these threads that come up, so yeah, I’m content to focus on your inability to use language correctly. And it’s “argument”, by the way.
Your statement completely misrepresents the passage quoted. The results as outlined in the passsage do not appear to support any claim about men who are “sexually satisfied.” Parameters measured included how fun (ie. “gratifying”) participants felt sex generally was as well as how much total previous sexual experience the participants had. It is not possible to derive from this data information about how “sexually satisfied” each participant was.
For further information on this phenomenon, Duck Duck Go has an illlustrated essay about the practice.
You’re outrightly calling another poster a liar. Wasn’t there some rule about that?
I just googled paternity leave feminist as suggested, to see for myself. I got a mixture of hits showing various combinations of the words “parental leave”, “paternity leave”, and “maternity leave”.
To be reported RSN.
That isn’t autocorrect. He is a liar. And report away.
Well, ark at little miss semantics.
Does a search for “paternity leave feminist” bring up numerous “maternity leave” hits? Yes. Does replacing paternity with maternity also bring up numerous “paternity leave” hits? No. These are facts, and calling me a liar won’t change them.
You provided a cite that he doesn’t like hard chairs. Your claim was that he, or rather no anonymous MRA, had sued a school on the basis of the hardness of its chairs and the discomfort caused thereby. Your “cite” does not support this position. You were wrong. You remain wrong. Refusing to concede your wrongness only makes your furtherly wrong.
I suppose that’s easy to claim when your entire worldview as a feminist is that there is no institutional discrimination against men. I dare say if you could prove systemic bias against men in education, employment and the courts you would feel it was gendered. But obviously you can’t, because women benefit from gender biases.
Well, at least you’ve moved from “it means the opposite of what you think it means” to “it’s not possible” to derive the information I claimed. You’re still wrong, though.
Not that it matters, I only quoted that bit due the feminist habit of claiming their opponents must be sexually frustrated, when the data in that study shows that the sexually frustrated are more likely to be biassed in favour of women.
Any comment on the rest of the article, that’s not about sexual activity?
Just a note (in general) so everyone is clear, calling anyone a “liar” outside the Pit is seen as insulting/calling names and will be modded/noted as such from here on.
Please don’t call anyone that from here on if outside of that forum.
I’m assuming accusations of prevarication will be handled similarly?
Whoops, sorry, wrong forum.
Someone on another board regularly told the story about when he stopped by the police station to confirm that his child’s car seat was properly installed, and he got into a conversation about sex offenders. The officer said that most of them are young men who had consensual sex with high school girls they thought were of legal age because they met in a bar. The girls obviously had fake IDs, and most of them didn’t even want charges filed because not only were they not raped, they admitted that they were as likely as the man to have initiated it in the first place.
The reason he was interested was because he had a relative who had gone out drinking, and when the bar closed, he knew he was too drunk to drive home and didn’t have money for a cab, so he walked the mile or so home. Halfway there, he had to relieve himself, so he stood behind a hedge and did exactly that. A police car happened to drive by, and “because he had his wiener out within 1,000 feet of an elementary school”, he’s now considered a sex offender. :rolleyes: If he was doing this at 3pm on a school day, yes, he would be, but not at 3am on a weekend night!
As for men being discriminated against in divorce cases, please explain how. Sorry, when I was growing up, I saw way too many women and children left penniless while he drove a sports car and had a stable of teenage girlfriends that he took on fancy vacations rather than pay child support or see the kids. A huge percentage of divorces are the result of fathers claiming to want children, and then refusing to care for them after they’re here. :mad:
As for domestic violence, you do have a point, and it’s also a huge problem in the gay community. A while back, there was a fatal case of DV in my city involving a lesbian couple. 
Alimony is taxable income. Child support isn’t.
BINGO! I’m glad someone else has had my experience WRT this. I do not believe in 50/50 physical custody because every case I’ve ever seen of it personally was a family dynamic like this, with one exception. In that case, it looked like the divorce was almost entirely his fault, but her behavior post-divorce indicated otherwise, and the kids all ended up living primarily with him, mainly because of her parade of scummy boyfriends. :eek:
You know, far be it from me to question the absolute veracity of things you read from someone else wrote on a message board that he says he heard from a cop, but I’m pretty confident that the statistic you wrote above is not correct at all.
Again, I’m sorry to tell you this but that definitely did not actually happen.
Yeah, I don’t think the first thing you said is at all typical of how child support cases usually end up playing out. How are you even visioning that being able to legally happen?
A case? Sounds huge, all right! I’d better replace my defensive nerf bat with a wiffle bat (just in case).
Criminal charges yet to be laid against Brian Banks false rape accuser. He spent five years in jail for it.
That really sucks. I hope he gets justice somehow.
Agreed.
Some people on another board claimed that the Brian Banks story on “60 Minutes” was timed to drum up sympathy for the boys in the Steubenville rape case. I got pilloried for disagreeing! Even when I pointed out to one of the most vocal people that being incarcerated for a crime you did not commit ranks up there with the death of a child on the list of “Things Nobody Deserves To Experience”, they still didn’t back down.
:rolleyes:
And in this case, it appears that no rape even happened at all! :mad: Just because a woman makes an accusation against a man does not automatically mean that it is true.