You would say that, she-lady man hater!
Wait. Fuck. I did it again.
I thought you were going to guess!:smack:
If you’re serious about this equality stuff, you’ll have to call him a whore like you did me.
Hey look, I’m all for letting men treat women however they want to treat them. But women should also be allowed to treat other women any way they want as well. Equality!
My guesses:
Ambivalid: phone center worker.
CCitizen: virgin.
Do I need to be present to win?
I can’t bring myself to actually read multiple pages of a thread with a title extolling the virtues of Men’s Rights Advocacy. Is anyone taking it seriously?
Followup: Anyone unironically used the term “feminazi?”
I am sorry if my words offended anyone, but I have not used that word, nor did I flame first.
If asking you when the last time you had sex constitutes a flame, no wonder you think men are oppressed.
On the board where 91% of women and 61% of men are feminist this issue was not well received.
Statistics for americans in general are different – on conservative boards I had success with the issue.
In any case I can discuss many of my other interests on this forum.
It’s like asking a 60 yo lady if men find her as attractive as 40 years ago.
Actually it’s nothing like that.
I don’t get it. Like, when I posted on this board that vaccines cause autism, everyone shouted me down and said science proves otherwise. This issue was not well received. On conservative and mommy boards, I had success with the issue.
Clearly, the conclusion is that the Dope is flawed and I am definitely not the one with flawed logic here.
Except it’s not at all.
Are we looking at the same poll 
Cause that one’s reading 48%/27%. And either way, you can’t really use that as an accurate read of the board. That’s just the percentages regarding the group of people who actually answered the poll. It’s not just a randomly selected group.
And as for the article, I wonder if their definition of a feminist (someone who believes in social, political, and economic equality of the sexes) matches yours. Cause I can guarantee you that most people are going to answer yes when it’s defined like that. Defining it as ‘someone who thinks men are evil and should be pushed back down from their centuries long position as king of the hill and made to eat circus peanuts forever’ might get some different results.
Except when I used that same analogy on my Justin Bieber Harry Potter slash fanfic board, they totally agreed I was dead on. How embarrassing for you, tbh.
No, we definitely believe in that, too.
On political issues there may be different ideologies which can not be proved or disproved – only the free market of ideas can decide how many followers an idea gains.
Isn’t the free market of ideas subverted when you lie all the time?
Wrong. Conservatives who don’t believe in evolution or global warming are objectively wrong. As are conservatives who believe a woman’s body has ways of shutting down a rape baby or vaccines cause autism. Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy.
I provided a link to the video of the events in question on youtube.
Some liberals classify their opponents ideas as lies and believe they should be forbidden.
I am not going to discuss my ideas on evolution…
In any case, expressing ideas which bring the hostility of masses is scary. Knowing that at least a sizable minority shares my ideas is comforting.
I guess I should not have raised the issue on this board.