Michael paid to get that look…
Boy are you guys all going to feel stupid when you find out this is a magical flying baby.
ALL THE FACTS PEOPLE
ALL THE FACTS
Yeah, supposedly when they were on tour, Pops would snag a hooker or a groupie and after he was done with her, pass her around to the boys, and if he couldn’t find one he’d pass Michael around. That still doesn’t excuse this stunt however!
Anybody ever see the video of Michael dancing with the kid that played Webster (who’s parents later took out a restraining order against Michael after he checked himself and “Webster” into a hotel together, listing them as “father and son”)? The expression on Michael’s face is positively creepy! No man should ever look at a child like that!
This also reminds me of something a friend pointed out about a series of tour dates that Michael had booked. All of them were in countries where child prostitution was rampant.
Touché
Nice one.
Holy shit this thread is hilarious. Between Eve and jar I’m gonna pee my pants.
Hold up a sec. You mean he’s got three kids, and two of them have the same name, and the other one has another name? That’s just … weird. Three kids with the same name – almost makes sense in an egomaniac, George Formany kind of way. But this is just a Larry, Darryl and Darryl freakshow.
I also vote No on the hanging the baby over the railing thing.
“face”
BWAHAHAHA I am dying over here, guys!
Forget Iraq.
Invade Neverland.
Paris Katherine is a GIRL. That’s why she has a different name.
The kid who played Webster is Emmanuel Lewis.
Oooh boy, I know you were joking . . . but why that final scene from the Waco Branch Davidians standoff suddenly pop into my head?
It’s interesting how difficult it is to tell if the sort of crowd who gathers to gawk at a pop star is screaming in terror or celebrity-worshipping ecstasy.
Okay, I know this is wrong, but I went back and looked at that picture again, and played the beginning of “Circle of Life” in my head. And it was funny.
“NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAnts ingonyama bagithi baba…”
I don’t mean to take anything away from the wisecracks of Eve and jarbabyj, but why no high-fives for gobear’s William Pierce joke? Too subtle?
I’ve adopted it as a coping mechanism-- imagine William Pierce’s soul in that little body, and suddenly, everything’s okay.
I wonder if he’d bounce, or just sort of spread out?
Yes, Gobear is too subtle for his own good. I had to go look up William Pierce.
.
.
.
.
.
Okay, now I get it. 
Yes, very funny.
FTR, CNN.com, quoting Reuters, now says that it was a fourth-floor balcony.
http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/11/19/jackson.baby.reut/index.html
Also, they’re careful to say that it was only a “light-skinned baby”, not “Michael Jackson’s son”. Which raises the even more appalling, although fortunately probably not true possibility, that he was doing this with someone else’s child…
Yeah. That would be so much better. :rolleyes:
What’s with that look on Jackson’s face anyway? I’m not quite sure how to describe it… but it ain’t normal.
Thank God, the baby was spared, and we’ve been spared Michael Jackson subsequent cover of “Tears in Heaven”
George Bush should include MJ in his axis of evil. Maybe Ashcroft can pull some strings and have MJ busted as soon as he returns to the states. Treat him like any other terrorist—you know, take his money, liberate the captive children, and hold MJ incommunicado at an undisclosed location for a few dozen years.
And we’ve also been spared MJ’s tearful prison interview where he describes what his fellow inmates do to baby killers.
Arnold is verging on starting a GD in the MPSIMS thread with the question of whether it’s better to be born to a rich freak or loving, poor parents.
That is Michael Jackson’s face, and it definitely ain’t normal.