monstro:
Let me try to reflect back to you what I have heard you saying in this last post and to some degree in this thread. You personally have experienced many statements made by people who you know are trying to be your friend (and many others) as “paper cuts” and the volume of them is, to you, oppressive. You believe that most who are minorities share in that experience and that perception. You are asking that “others” be empathic to you (and by extension to all minorities, whatever they experience as their sensitivities or as offensive to any degree as you believe your take is representative of the groups overall). You personally will only become friends with Whites who are able to be consistently not say things that get on your nerves - which you label as “empathic enough” … i.e., thinking of how something might possibly sound to you and filtering/adjusting their behavior as much as needed to keep you comfortable. If a White person is unable or unwilling to do that then you will tolerate them as classmates or co-workers but not accept them as friends. You want them to have the manners to be constantly aware of how you might take things because you don’t want to have to be polite.
Is that an accurate reflection of your last post and position in this thread?
If so then I will leave it stand and propose that you have well articulated your thoughts about how paper cuts cumulatively hurt you, and you believe, many other minorities, and how many Whites just do not have enough empathy to appreciate it.
The rest is not addressed just to you monstro but to all who choose to engage -
Would you agree that statements are not necessarily objectively inoffensive or offensive but that such are judgements we all make? I am sure that some here would endorse a statement that many Whites would not find various statements offensive because they view those statements through the filters of their individual life experiences, be it “White privilege” or other. Would those same people also agree that many minorities would find certain statements offensive because of the lenses of their life experiences? That Whites would also find certain statements as offensive because if their lenses, that certain minorities would not find certain statements offensive because of theirs?
The following are very serious questions that I know can come off as being snarky. I apologize for that but I honestly can not come up with a more diplomatic way of asking it.
To those of the minority groups who feel that Whites overall demonstrate inadequate empathy - do you believe that you have the degree of empathy for others different than you, who see the world through a different lens than you, that you are encouraging Whites to have? Or do think that as a minority you do not need to? Do offenses perceived by others who are not minorities matter? Should someone who you think of as in a power position just suck it up and shut up?
Do you believe that the best way to address the issue that gets labelled as “micro-aggressions” is to bemoan how clueless so many Whites are that a large cohort of liberal Whites do not get it and that some Whites who want to be your friends are incapable of sufficient empathy? Do you think that the only understanding that has be done is Whites understanding how difficult it is to be you? Is any and all explanation of the thoughts and feelings of those who are not you but whose behaviors are viewed through your lens as hurtful, defensiveness (unless it is the explanation that you already believe to be “truth”)?
Despite the accusation that doing so makes me complicit, I am going ignore asking questions of anyone who would endorse explicit racist or sexist beliefs as well uninteresting to this discussion.
To those who would disagree strongly with any explicitly racist or sexist statements … do you believe that some of what you do and say is influenced by unconscious racist tapes and that some that you believe is innocent is actually correctly read as offensive to a minority member, even if only slightly so?
What should be your response when offense is taken by something that you are confident was done with no ill intent, even at a subconscious level?
If your best honest assessment is that no offense should be taken (you certainly wouldn’t be offended) is the offense taken all the responsibility of the offended?
If you something you say or do inadvertently offends should the offended say something or just silently deal with it … lick the paper cut and move on, to beat that analogy into the ground? If say something then what? If neither then what?
What are the best paths forward?
Thanks for any input.