Can anybody guess why they refused to identify where the camera was that took the picture? Not, say the name of the cameraman or the type of camera, but even the general location?
If the large piece included the wing’s leading edge, shouldn’t it be obvious if it was the left or right wing?
I would be fairly certain that any camera that could resolve the shuttle’s wing some 200,000+ feet away isn’t a standard camera you can get at your local photo shop. Not to mention that at zoom magnifications fo that caliber the camera can’t be handheld and expected to work (i.e. no cameraman per se unless you count a guy in some control room pushing buttons). A lense sufficient to zoom in that well probably isn’t even man-portable.
At this stage, that’s jumping to a conclusion. We don’t yet know that the leading edge is the problem and Nasa certainly aren’t assuming that it is. The new photo is very interesting, as is the accompanying Aviation Week story. But it’s only one piece of evidence.
Even if the photo shows what it appears to, the wing is likely to have failed at this point leaving a piece of debris that needn’t necessarily plainly show this failure along its remaining lead edge. The bigger surprise, though it’s no doubt merely a reflection of caution on Kostelnik’s part, is that they can’t yet tell which wing it is merely from the shape. But you should be able to tell that from most parts of the wing, not just the leading edge.