Milum, you're making things worse

The BBQ Pit
1

I hereby pit Milum, for his “contribution” in this thread, in particular for the following:

This sort of rhetoric is really a serious problem. Milum here is essentially insinuating that an opponent of Bush = an enemy of the country as a whole. There are all too many conservatives who seem to think that basically labeling half the citizens of the U.S. as its enemies (or even worse, traitors a la Coulter) is acceptable. This kind of rhetoric, combined with G.W.Bush’s utter failure to live up to his claim of being a “uniter, not a divider,” is a serious problem.

These conservatives don’t just want to defeat the people (loyal citizens) who disagree with them, they want to destroy them. Numerous Republicans are on record as saying they wish to create a permanent Republican majority, i.e. a de facto one party state.

Folks, whether you’re Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green, or whatever, at least half the country doesn’t agree with you. Being in denial about that will not help anything. It’s important to realize that this is not a problem, it is essential to the health of a democracy. Attempting to silence and/or demonize people who disagree with you–taken too far–represents a significant threat to democracy.

I could launch into a feel-good “we need to put aside our differences and work together” speech, but I know it will be useless.

Milum, you obseqious, hate-filled, bottom-feeding scum sucker, figure it out. Disagreeing with you about this country’s present direction does not make someone the enemy of the country.

Oh, gotta love this strawman, Milum, you piece of excrement I scrape off my shoe:

No one here wants Americans to have died in vain, you fucking asshole.

What we fear is that the vanity for which our brave soldiers are fighting originated with the false premises, deceptions, and outright lies which were used to place them in harm’s way in the first place.

2

Not strictly true. A few wanted Americans to die, whether ‘in vain’ or not, who knows.

3

Can we make this a sticky?

4

Still, on the other hand, had the Dem’s been in charge there would most likely have been no American’s dying in Iraq.

5

The keys words here are “in vain”. But I think you know that. In that thread some people were suggesting that American deaths would cause a quicker end to the war/expose the administration/make Americans wake up/etc. etc. Not a view I personally hold, but certainly not in any way wanting “Americans to die…in vain.”

To even suggest it is to do exactly what the OP is talking about. Quite disgusting, though not really surprising…

6

Well, so long as they are wishing death on Americans for a good reason! After all, it is much better to want Americans to die so that you can ‘expose the administration’ than it would to want them to die in vain! Yep, much better. :rolleyes:

And you guys wonder why you are pegged as being unAmerican?

7

Nice try. Did you miss the part where I said “not a view I personally hold”?

Once again, just as the OP said, you’re attacking and labeling people unAmerican.

The OP said, “no one wants Americans to die in vain.”

You said, “not strictly true”.

When you were called on it you attack me (for a view I don’t even share) and call folks unAmerican, shifting the discussion to those “reasons”.

Just admit it: you lied. You wanted to suggest that people “wanted Americans to die in vain.” That sounds so terrible that just putting it out there is enough for you, even if it’s absolutely not true. Then when you’re caught in a lie, you can attack people for those “reasons”, thus accomplishing your goal of calling “us guys” unAmerican.

Nice one. :rolleyes:

8

How is dying to expose the administration any worse than dying to support it?

9

Milum’s just overdosing on conservative media propaganda, I’ll bet.

That stuff’s gonna make you blind, kid…

10

Sure, Brutus, Liberals hate America, shit in mom’s apple pie, molest Santa and the Easter Bunny and force Norman Rockwell to make paintings of naked nuns. How cleaver of you to figure this out.

11

And if you’re really not careful, it’ll give Milum hairy palms, too.

Robin

12

You sanctimonious asshole…

In supporting this godforsaken illegal war aren’t you wishing death on our troops?

Or do you think war can be fought without deaths?

13

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milum
"Again I say we have no worthwhile enemies, only sickos whose goal is to wish that our soldiers who died while preforming their duty for their country, men and women, will have died in vain. "

Damn, that’s some inflamatory shit. But I am unsure whether a “goal” can be “to wish” - I think most people either “wish” or they don’t.

As far as dying in vain, well, I’m sure Bush doesn’t consider the deaths he has caused to be in vain, whether they be the deaths of American soldiers or Iraqi children. I saw him on that original “Meet the Press” interview and he certainly appeared to be trying to act concerned when he talked about the “young ones” he was sending to war.

14

Milum’s a complete moron. Yutz. Waste of space. It’s best to let your eyes slide over any post with his name attached.

Now, I suppose, he’ll show up to refer to me as Orge. Cause see, he’s clever.

15

No, that would be Brutus.

16

There’s room for both of them in the Moron Brigade.

Robin

17

Raise your hand if you’re surprised Brutus doesn’t get it…

18

Oh you might be right but Brutus is just so damn short, sharp, consise and CONSISTENT.

19

You have to at least give Milum some major points for originality. In a recent thread I started he referred to the SCoTUS who heard the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman (5 Republican & 4 Democratic appointees with a median age of 66) as

In the same thread he couldn’t understand how calling somebody a queer in 1968 was an insult.

Of course his usual modus operandi is to make a ludicrous half-baked jingoist statement thoroughly unsupported by data (it’s odd- he can figure out how to post in red but the hyperlink button evidently confuses him) and then, when his ass is handed to him sauteed in garlic butter and resting on a bed of romaine, to take the moral highground with an “at least in Alabama, we have manners” non-sequitur (referring to Hillary Clinton as a man being somehow consistent with those manners). (Of course in one thread about creationism in Georgia education he went on a rant about how it’s nobody’s business other than Georgians what Georgians teach; when I and several other Georgians immediately posted “you have our permission, non-Georgiatics- preach on” we were traiters.

In fairness, I certainly don’t think Milum is an idiot: many of his posts show evidence of some reading and even sporadic flashes of wit. Unfortunately the semblance of being barking mad is less sporadic.

20

I´ve always thought of him as “the lights are on, but there´s nobody home”