Well, Reza, this is simple…has any psychic been able to predict the current location of the plane to within a reasonable degree of uncertainty? Let’s say, within 1 square mile. Has any psychic been able to produce map coordinates for the location of the plane?
If someone has that information, to a useful degree of specificity, I’m sure that the authorities would be interested.
You’re rolling something alright.
There are plenty of topics on the missing plane, not on using psychics to find it.
The reason no one of any importance is advocating using psychics is because contrary to your belief, they have an absolutely awful track record. Psychics don’t work. None of them. If you think they do feel free to start a thread about that, but be prepared to be asked for evidence, and I strongly doubt any evidence you present is going to be of reasonable quality to satisfy anyone here.
He’s going to have egg on his face once the plane’s finally located on Mars…
What I want to know is, why don’t the authorities come right out and say it was most likely pilot suicide? You don’t need to be psychic to realize that all evidence points to that scenario.
How do you know what we’re thinking - are you…
guessing?
I don’t think we can conclude that.
First, I don’t think the evidence is as strong as you suggest. It’s certainly a possibility, perhaps even the leading hypothesis, but there are just too many unanswered questions to say it’s the probably cause of the accident. And without the wreckage and the black boxes there’s no way they’ll say that.
Second, what would be the point of reaching a conclusion now? It’s not going to stop the search effort or the investigation. If anything it will just prevent examining the evidence with an open mind. There’s nothing wrong with saying we simply don’t know yet. Anything else is counter-productive.
There’s a few holes in the suicide theory, you’re correct about that. But the other possible scenarios have even greater holes, and as Sherlock Holmes himself said, once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains must be the truth, no matter how improbable.
I’m not talking about reaching a conclusion about anything – shit, the plane wreck itself still hasn’t been found. Who knows what new evidence may yet come to light. However,* no one* in the media has openly discussed this possibility (or if they did, I missed it) except when it’s buried in a list of many other possible, yet unlikely, scenarios.
You’ve missed it. I’ve seen it discussed extensively.
Unless it turns out there’s water on Mars…
Because psychics can’t detect something once it falls through a rip in the space-time continuum.
Unless?
TriPolar said that the plane will be found “in or near a body of water”. Based on that unassailable fact, should the plane be found on Mars then the find itself would be proof positive of the existance of water there. Ipso defacto. Kalamazoo and Tyler, too.
It’s taking longer than we thought.
Besides, we already found the key clues.
The chances of anything flying to Mars are a million to one…
National Enquirer uses them I can see the headlines now.
Psychic locates Malaysian Flight 370 at the South Pole
Sources close to investigation have leaked conversations with the pilots using clairvoyants.
Malaysian Flight 370 revealed to still be floating on the surface of Southern Indian Ocean … spirits of the passengers revel last hours of Flight 370.
Money honey … this is bigger than Elvis still be sighted alive 
That might not take a psychic to discern.
Sherlock Holmes is a fictional character and this saying of his, although it sounds rigorous and logical, is bollocks.
If you don’t have all of the facts to hand, you may dismiss a bunch of impossible solutions and plump for an improbable one that is still wrong, because there’s another possibility or factor you don’t know about.
Besides, it’s not even as if some of the competing theories in this case truly can be dismissed as impossible.
Thank god. I thought it was just me who’s thinking ‘Alien Abduction’.
Emphasis mine, and that’s a fair statement; but I’m at a loss to think of any realistic scenario that hasn’t already been discussed to death on CNN. Can you think of anything they may have left out?
What other theories exist, besides terrorism? And if it was genuine terrorism, what jihad bears a grudge against the Southern Ocean? Because that was clearly the flight path, all along.
Thank you. This nonsense is usually used to scapegoat someone. The real world rarely offers the opportunity to eliminate all the other possibilities.