If I had to place a bet either way, I’d say he will.
In the long run they get in. Lots and lots of players who really weren’t regarded as Hall of Famers for a long time got in eventually. Eventually emotion goes away and numbers matter. Palmiero has numbers. He’s legitimately a huge asshole, but that gets forgotten over the years.
As to the first point, center field is an immensely important position and a great center fielder can be just as valuable as a great shortstop. andruw Jones was an AWESOME center fielder.
As to the second, yes, Jones’s career ended earlier than Vizquel’s. He was still a better player.
Should Andruw Jones be in the Hall of Fame? I’m not saying that; he didn’t make my ballot. There are many players who should be inducted before he is. But that serves to illustrate how weak Vizquel’s case was. Let’s do a Keltner List. (Note: I always modify my way of doing the Keltner List, but that doesn’t matter.)
- Was Omar Vizquel ever the best player in baseball, or argued to be the best player in baseball?
Of course not.
- Was Omar Vizquel the best player on his team?
He was not, not in any one season and not over the course of a number of seasons.
- Was Omar Vizquel the best player in baseball at his specific position?
No. This is a hard test, since he was a contemporary of Jeter, Garciaparra, and A-Rod, but it’s hard to imagine him being the best shortstop in baseball at any time. His best three-year run was probably 1997-1999, in which he amassed 12.8 WAR. I think the best shortstop in baseball will usually bear that pretty easily.
- Did Omar have an impact on some pennant races?
There wasn’t any season when Omar had a big impact on a pennant race. This is a hard standard.
- Should we give Omar extra credit for postseason performance?
This is a new question of my own devise; if you ain’t looking at the postseason performance of guys like Mariano Rivera or Manny Ramirez you’re missing a big part of the story.
Anyway, no. Omar didn’t play especially well in the playoffs. He never won a playoff series MVP Award, and never won a World Series.
- Did Omar play regularly past his prime?
Obviously he did. Vizquel had almost his entire career value after the age of 27 and played a really long time.
- Are players with comparable numbers in the Hall of Fame?
Yes. There actually aren’t a lot of players WITH comparable numbers, just because he played in a lot of games for a shortstop. The top three comparable players - Aparicio, Maranville, and Ozzie - are all Hall of Famers. #4 is Bill Dahlen but he played in the 19th century so who cares. #5 is Davey Concepcion, who isn’t in, and after that the comparisons are pretty vague. Aparicio and Maranville are legitimately similar; Smith, for reasons I’ll go into later, isn’t a great comparison.
- Do Omar’s numbers meet Hall of Fame standards?
Omar was a very poor hitter for a Hall of Famer, but that said he was as good as Aparicio and Maranville, more or less. I guess the question is how good their choices were. That said, far more players - even shortstops - in the Hall of Fame are way better hitters. Those guys are outliers.
- What evidence is there to suggest this player is better, or worse, than his numbers would superficially suggest?
Omar Vizquel is often compared to Ozzie Smith, who is in the Hall of Fame, because they’re similar players and I think it helps both their names start with O. It’s often argued Omar is as good as Ozzie so he should get in.
Omar Vizquel was NOT as good a player as Ozzie Smith. He just wasn’t. Ozzie Smith was a better player on both sides of the ball. Omar was a great fielder, but Ozzie was the GREATEST fielder; in my opinion Ozzie Smith was actually the best fielder in the history of baseball, at any position. That’s no insult to Omar, just as it would be no insult to a really great quarterback to say he wasn’t as great as Tom Brady.
Where stats will throw you is in offensive numbers. Superficially Omar looks like a decent hitter, better than Ozzie. He was not; he was measurably less valuable. The offensive context of Ozzie’s career is WAY different than Omar’s. Teams in the AL in the 90s scored a shitload more runs than teams in the NL in the 80s.
In 1985, when Ozzie had a really good year and the Cardinals won the pennant, the BEST offensive team in the NL, the Cardinals, scored 747 runs. During Omar’s day, 747 runs would have been a pathetic offense.
- Is Omar the best shortstop not in the Hall of Fame?
There aren’t a whole lot of particular strong shortstop candidates, actually, now that Trammell is in, unless you count guys yet to come, like Jeter, A-Rod, and the like.
In my opinion, once you discount guys not eligible yet, the best shortstop ever who isn’t in the Hall is Bert Campaneris, who was a hell of a player. There are lots of other guys at least as good as Omar and some probably better.
- Did Omar win MVP Awards, or finish high in the voting?
Omar was mentioned in MVP voting only once, in 1999, when he got all of 3 points. If elected to the Hall he would absolutely be the least-MVP-mentioned player of modern times in the Hall.
- Okay, what about All Star games?
Three All Star games, which is below HOF standards but it’s not a clinch; Robin Yount only went to three. It’s not a point in his favor.
- If Omar Vizquel was the best payer on his team could that team finish in first placet?
No. He wasn’t that good. Maybe is a really weak division? Omar’s career high in WAR was 6 even, and I can’t think of any pennant winners who didn’t have a player at least a little better than that, and that was far and away his best year. He was a really good player but you need better ones to win a pennant.
- Did Omar have some special impact on the course of baseball history?
No.
- Was this player a sportsmanlike gentleman?
Sure he was.
That’s not a great list.