Moderator Actions! Come one come All!

The BBQ Pit
101

I understand from where kabbes is coming Shayna. I think he’s trying to imagine if you’ve set some kind of precedent here in which if you “feel” that someone is “becoming angry”, then you can simply decree that that person can’t reply to your posts for fear of being reported to their ISP for harassment. I think we wonder that if you can get away with this, what would happen if many pthers here adopted that tactic. Fair question to ask I think, and I don’t see where you’ve actually answered the question.

I would like to know in Cartoony can reply to a post of yours at any time in the future without fear of being narced out.

Didn’t you notice that Euty said these very wise words:

He didn’t exactly direct those words to you, but I’d think that they’d apply to anyone here…including you.

BTW, how exactly is it that you can figure out what ISP someone is using?

102

Krispy, you really do have a problem with reading comprehension, don’t you? What part of

and

did you not understand?

103

Why not just cut the crap Shayna and tell us if you are going to report Cartoony if he responds to one of your posts?

disclaimer My anger is not rising disclaimer

Oh, and how about sharing how it is that you will determine which ISP a member is using?

104

hey Krispy unless you are Cartooniverse it’s really none of your business.

105

Well I think it is because if she will do it to him, she will do it to me or you or anyone else. And I don’t think that it’s a good precedent to set…I can envision the same kind of scenario that kabbes outlined.

106

Look out, guys, Shayna’s gonna getcha!

Y’know, everyone, I think we should thank Krispy… because of his comments, our eyes have rolled so many times that our optic muscles are as strong as they could be.

107

I can only conclude that mr. Original either hasn’t read my most recent question yet, or that he is chosing to ignore it.

Where was I inaccurate, Krispy? Or can you finally be a man and admit you made an unsubstantiated allegation?

108

Look Shayna - how many times can I post sentiments on the variation of “your decisions are your decisions” and “if that is what you choose to do then that is up to you”? There is no need to get “weary” of me - I’m not pursuing you; really I’m not. I’m interested in the general, not the specific. If you feel that your words are warranted, then I respect that, especially seeing as how I’m not a mod and it doesn’t involve me.

But the general case is something else. It is not unreasonable to think that posters X, Y and Z will see this and think what a good idea it is. Hell - 'verse already tried it! OK, he didn’t copy you exactly and got slapped down for making it a legal issue, but the intent-to-copy was there. Who knows which other posters will follow suit?

And in response to your last post (hoo, I could feel the escalating anger in it!), whilst of course all harrassment is against the rules of the ISP and can lead to loss of internet priveleges, you declaring that any attempt by 'verse to address you would be considered harrassment is something new.

But fuck it. A - this is getting me nowhere and B - it just seems to be pissing you off, so I’m not gaining anything by pursuing it. Consider it closed.*

pan

[sub]*Note - was going to end with humorous comment but thought that it may be misconstrued and continue this useless argument. So I deleted it. Aren’t I good? :)[/sub]