Monkey With a Gun Needs to be Disarmed

Eh, I’ve been looking for somebody to Pit, and while Monkey With a Gun is really low hanging fruit, WTF, he/she (hereafter called “It”) pissed me off today.

It called two of us liars in the same thread, and by implication, most of us who posted to the thread. Okay, it was the Pit, but considering the subject, what a complete idiot. I don’t know how old It is, but I have found Curtis to be far more civil if not necessarily better informed.

The thread was a rant about claims by theists that atheists aren’t moral. Quite a few of us atheists related personal experiences of being confronted with such accusations and beliefs by theists.
That wasn’t good enough for It:

Yes, It actually typed “blew moon”.

Not content to merely imply that the OP lied, he says so explicitly:

Czarcasm strolls by and says to the doubting It:

It replies that there are no relevant links on page one of the search results.

I find this doubtful, repeat the search and find several relevant links, and say so and link to them. I ask It WTF It was searching for.

It comes back and now says I am making shit up. Then I posted the Google results page, which I got with a verbatim “exact phrase” search. It just picked out a couple of key words, and searched for that. As it turns out at least a couple of results of Its search turn out to be relevant, but It denied it because It apparently doesn’t have much of an attention span.

Finally It retreats to denial and insults:

I think It is somewhere wiping the foam off Its jowls and is preparing for Its next attack on reality.

The think is, I don’t mind people being wrong. Shit I’ve been wrong at least once, and accused of being wrong many more times. Even when I’m sure the other person is utterly wrong, I don’t resort to personal attacks, and I don’t appreciate it when I am the recipient of them.

Thank you for your attention.

Too easy. No points at all for you, sir.

I’d give 'em a couple for post structure. That had to take a good ten minutes with all the quotes and links.

Yeah, but I deducted for insufficient swearing.

Fair enough.

It? Hmm.

Though I’ve always thought “once in a blew moon” makes more sense. I think a moon that’s just gotten head happens way less often than a blue one.

I was involved in that Pit thread (and was right proper PISSED OFF by Monkey’s ignorant shit-spouting), so I endorse this pitting.

Did s/he ever come back after being so thoroughly thrashed by counterevidence? I shall have to go check.

As one of the participants in that thread who was indirectly accused of lying about things that my own parents have said to me, I endorse this pitting as well.

Apparently, in Monkey’s mind, if he/she didn’t directly observe or experience it, it doesn’t exist.

To be fair, that’s kinda human nature. Where Monkey went wrong was in continuing to insist that s/he was correct, after being overwhelmingly refuted.

That, and generally just being a douchebag about it in the first place. :smiley:

Mr. Monkey seems to have taken the mere discussion of the possibility that some Christians may consider atheists immoral, er, rather personally. I don’t recall anyone accusing him, personally, of feeling that way, at least until he went, well, apeshit.

Dude (or dudette), IT’S THE PIT. FUCK BEING FAIR!!111ELEVENTY ONE11!! :smiley:

You’re right. I’m sorry.

Fuck that fucking sorry cunt-rag!

(Better? :wink: )

[I’m a dude, FWIW.]

Well, it’s fucking start. Dude. :cool:

Please… I have already established that correct gender neutral term for Monkey With a Gun is “It”.

My OP is my cite.

Fuck your cite and the horse it rode in on.

“Fuck your cite and the monkey it rode in on” would have earned you triple points.

Perhaps “Fuck your monkey, and the cite It rode in on” would have received tens across the board from Boyo Jim.

If you are calling someone ‘It’ does the phrase “As it turns out at least a couple of results of Its search turn out to be relevant” require an apostrophe in ‘Its’? (I know that ‘its’ doesn’t require an apostrophe. I am just wondering if the rule changes when ‘It’ happens to be being used as a person’s name)

Sorry. Off topic pondering there.

Yes. It’s possessive, like in “Dave’s research”.

It’s = “it is”.

Its = “belonging to it”

just like Hers = “belonging to her”

Which is what I think you meant, Chefguy.