Just in case no one ever explained this to you before: The fact that you think Subject X is the most fascinating topic ever does NOT meant that everyone else agrees.
Some hints that the person you are burbling to is less than enthralled and what you should do in response:
a) utter minimal feedback.
You: Five paragraph recap of the action in last night’s episode of some TV show.
Victim: Uh. Don’t watch that show.
You SHOULD NOT respond with: A half hour lecture on all the significant developments over the four years that the show has been on.
You SHOULD: Change the subject! Say something like: Oh, too bad, I really like it. What shows do YOU watch?
b) attempts to flee.
You: At a party you have met (cornered) a new acquaintance and are deep into explaining the subtext behind “The Patty Duke Show” and how it really wasn’t a light weight sitcom but the first significant blow against the Judeo-Christian ethos by the nascent homosexual liberation movement.
Victim: Fascinating. [looks around frantically] Oh, there’s…uh, Mary! I need to go talk with her about…um, taking care of my dog next weekend.
You SHOULD NOT respond with: I’ll come with you, I bet Mary used to watch the show, too, but maybe she hasn’t realized that the fact that Cathy parted her hair while Patty didn’t means…
You SHOULD respond with: Okay, nice meeting you. LET YOUR VICTIM GO. YOU HAVE ALREADY STRUCK OUT, GIVE UP. Maybe the next person you meet WILL share your fascination with ‘identical cousins.’
c) clear attempts to cut you off from going down a path you are heading for.
You: I heard a great new joke about Pope John Paul II, three chickens and a jewish haberdasher. OR I read an article in yesterdays Chronical about the effect of global warming on spotted salamanders. OR I saw <<movie that just opened>> last night and let me tell you, it has the lamest plot twists.
Victim: I already heard that joke OR Yes, I read that article OR Don’t spoil that movie for me, we’re going to see it this weekend!
You SHOULD NOT blindly bulldoze your way along as if the victim hadn’t spoken. DO NOT tell the joke. DO NOT proceed to recap the article in detail. DO NOT continue to talk about the movie, even if you say you only only revealing “minor spoilers.”!
d) Awkward transitions as the victim tries to change the subject:
You: ....which proved in vain because Napoleon had already anticipated that the English army--
Victim: Oh, Napoleons! I love them. I like to bake, really, anything. Are you into cooking?
You SHOULD NOT look at your victim blankly, then continue on with critiquing the battle of Waterloo. Be a good guy, try to find something to say about cooking. Or offer a new tangent of your own -- No, I'm not much of a cook, but I love eating out. What's your favorite restaurant?
I’ll make it real simple for you: if you are deep into discussing your favorite subjects and the other party isn’t holding up their half of the conversation eagerly, please do either of two things: Move along to a new subject or move along to a new person.
Please.
Pretty please, says the woman who was just trapped in a car on a 90 minute journey while one passenger delivered a nearly non-stop monologue on the first episode of “Revelations” and how it compared to other end of times books/movies AND how it related to the Bible, complete with quotations. The other two people in the car 1) had not seen the show 2) expressed no interest in hearing about the show and 3) have no interest in the subject matter at all. We tried, over and over, to divert the ‘conversation’ but no matter what other topic we tried to start talking about, she would simply return to drivelling along about Revelations.
Hey, Sally, guess what? When you hit the restroom while we were at the gas station in Manchester, we actually discussed driving off just so you could experience being ‘left behind’ first hand. (Heh. Heh.)
Lucky for you that even though we are evil Secular Humanists, we are relatively kind-hearted ones. Your next victims might not be.
That’s just beautiful!
