I’m tellin’ ya. Fun fun fun. Count the all caps. Note the hysterics. Yep. Ambushed is right on track here with the over-the-top melodrama. But I know. I know. I just don’t understand the grievous distress he feels over all the LIES LIES LIES LIES!!!
Between Beryl’s veritable Stars and Stripes blue-red-gray/white post and this assault of granny apple red and smurf blue, I’m wondering if the hamsters aren’t having a little of the happy hallucinating sauce, ifyaknowwhatimean. I mean, really, what are the odds that two people within a day of each other could … well, y’all have seen the posts.
What does ambushed have againt Mormons? Of all the various religious and ethnic groups out there, ripe for the mocking, why the hell would one pick on the Mormons? Puzzling.
“Fetid dingo’s kidneys” is an appropriated Douglas Adams-ism. Not that its use is ever inappropriate or unwanted; just keeping credit where credit is due.
Where she stupidly but vigorously defended siccing the cops on her and other kids if they dared to disobey her orders against peer intimacy. Her vapid, purely emotional arguments to the effect that juvenile imprisonment was better for kids than becoming intimate of their own accord was bested by the arguments of myself and others. We never interacted at any other time, and she was absolutely no part of the current debate. She’s simply lashing out based on her sad need for revenge. Pay her no mind.
ambushed, you’re impeaching the credibility of two venerable posters who have done noting but point out your consistently erratic behavior.
BTW: Al Franken already has the trademark on Lying Liars. Just take a trip and buy a bottle of whiskey, go home, pour the bottle down the sink and huff into the paper sack for a while. Please. For the children.
Mr. B pretty much nailed it. Love the colored lettering, man. That’s a thing of beauty.
ambushed so far has demonstrated “debating techniques” that are questionable at best and pathetically hilarious at worst. And yeah, I got a lovely taste of these techniques on another thread (which does not remotely resemble the bizarre write-up he gives it here). Most everyone had given up on that train-wreck of a thread by the time he’d come in, so only a choice few of us were treated to his melodramatic and hysterical temper tantrums.
But hey! Now you all get to enjoy it! Isn’t it fun?
And you’re rewarding liars for lying. How proud you must be!
There is nothing “erratic” about being offended by vicious attacks and lies. If you folks had any grain of honesty, at least you would admit that Monty lied, without which this thread would not exist.
But no. All you people have done is tried to display what you think of as “wit” but you have consistently evaded the facts, probably because they’re all against you.
No one here has shown any regard whatever for the actual facts, and that tells me all I need to know about you folks in Pit land.
The fact is, you’re coming off as a spitting raving lunatic, whom people would edge away from if they met him (him?) on the street.
It’s time to take a break, my friend. Seriously. I’m a past master at losing my temper on the Boards – ask around – but it’s never a good idea to go so entirely postal that it appears that, no matter how egregious and justified the complaint, the complainer is a histrionic irrational whack-job.
Shake it off. Come back and post when you have enough of a grip to set out your opinions rationally and without COLORS or CAPS.
I have nothing against the Mormons or the LDS Church as a whole! Please re-read the O.P. to learn the truth.
I cited facts that show that, at times, official Mormon interviews – particularly those with young people – have crossed the line into intolerable sexual prurience. Again, read my O.P. for the truth.
Here’s more evidence that what I quoted is the truth and is a significant problem, from The Mormon Alliance
So get a grip, folks! Admit the fact that Monty lied.
Or keep lying to yourselves along with the rest of us.
Thank you, Jodi, for a sensible reply. You’re the first to offer one, and I appreciate it.
Not that I can quite agree with your characterization of what I see as my perfectly legitimate anger at being attacked with such obvious lies, but something has to explain the utter disregard for facts here, and perhaps you’re right that some people are ignoring the facts because they don’t like the fact that I’m actually expressing anger and outrage in the Pit (of all places!)
I see. You’re some mystic who claims to be able to divine unwritten, non-existent claims from the absence of words. I’m sure you have a nice tin-foil hat.
I said exactly what I said and implied nothing more. Only a deliberate liar (like Monty, and yourself it would appear) could claim with a straight face that those words even <I>insinuate</I> that it says “the purpose of the temple recommend interview was for the purpose of gratification”!
Why do you feel so compelled to be so dishonest with the facts?