Really? Because-- you know-- I’ve seen the liberals on this board defend some patently insane things under the guise of “well, everyone knows it!”. But hey, if you want to turn this into the proverbial pissing contest, I’m all for it.
Read this story. Think on it, and ask yourself whether you’re certain you’re the king.
Sure, and if you’re selling something, all publicity is good publicity.
No matter that your name is brought up as some kind of benchmark for retarded knee jerking. We also remember a baseballl player named Mendoza as well, for analogous reasons.
The guy will be banned by the end of the month.
Aww, wait until Nov 7 so we can mock him some more after the election is over.
I’m not talking about things like economic policy. I appreciate that you think we’re all mad, but that sort of thing is complex and requires debate. I’m talking about things that are proven obviously wrong with a single cite, like his claiming that Romney will win 400+ electoral votes. You could plan to vote for Romney, you could argue in favor of his policies, but if you’re even the littlest bit connected to reality you should be able to go “Yeeah, dial it back some. That’s not going to happen.”
Most people aren’t willing to call out their own political allies, no matter how crazy/dumb. I understand that. Most conservative posters here have been pretty silent in threads where moonshot is shitting himself. I’m just pointing out you’re the only asshole here who’s enough of a partisan troll to say that’s not feces but potpourri. You yourself have said you’re not here for rational debate, so own it.
Romney will win in a landslide
What if 538 is right, and Romney loses by 60+ electoral votes View Single Post"
Those posts don’t reference moonshot, but you can clearly see that I’ve never said-- nor insinuated-- that Romney would win in a landslide. Therefore, this matter should be settled (though I fear it will not be).
This post has been Romneyed by Romney-Facting™
Yeah, I’m also curious who, if anyone, claimed Romney was going to take 400+. Klaatu said “over 300”, which strikes me as wishful thinking, but over 400 is pure fantasy.
Or, of course, deep-cover liberalism.
Wow, you’re one dishonest fuck. I’m going to assume that was taken from the above link I provided, in which case you will see jsgoddess posted a link, to which I responded:
You appear to be changing focus from the fact that you’re defending moonshot925 (which is how any part of the conversation came to be about you) to wacky things that OMG a Black Conservative can’t be accused of saying.
That’s annoying. Please stop it.
I don’t think you understood what I was saying.
Read it again a few times and get back to me.
Okay, I read further and moonshot (in Klaatu’s thread) is indeed claiming Romney will top 400.
I daresay that dissolves his credibility faster than sulfuric acid on jell-o. Of course, he might be kidding, but I’ve little patience for people who tell a joke badly, and insist on telling it over and over.
Get real. Perhaps you need to go back to the top of the thread just so you can see how my name came up since. Ain’t no change of focus. It ain’t my job to police other posters. Of course, in the whacky world of liberal mentality, if you don’t comment on something another poster of the same political persuasion, then this constitutes some kind of grand failure or partisanship or something.
(Though, I have to wonder if this works both ways because, as I said earlier, I’ve seen some blatantly stupid comments get a pass by liberal commentators.)
Moonshot isn’t a right winger, he’s a troll. He might be conservative in real life, he might not, I have no idea, but he’s a troll here and that’s all he is.
The way the “smartest people on the internet” fall for these obvious clowns is
a:depressing
b:hilarious
c:baffling
d:all of the above
I’m going with d
I’d say good job to Moonshot, but trolling the dope is like picking fights with six year olds.
Oh man, the irony in this is just too much to bear. Excuse me while I go have a laughing fit.
On the other hand, there’s an entire topic on this board, being seriously discussed, regarding whether Romney should drop out of the race because it’s so blindingly obvious that Obama is going to crush him like a walnut in the fall election.
This in an election that is separated by only 3-4 percentage points, with the debates and 60 days of campaigning still to come.
Blind partisanship causes extreme interpretations regardless of which side it comes from.
Says the guy who has a delusional fantasy view of economics and whose last thread was centered around defending a creationist because he holds a similar delusional fantasy view of economics.
Blindly loving a concept of any sort is bad. Love should be based in reality.
I wasn’t defending ‘a creationist’. I was defending an article on economics having nothing to do with creationism.
You’re unhinged. You’re blinded by hatred and life in an echo chamber. I’d feel sorry for you if you weren’t so annoying.
Says the guy who still believes in Iraqi WMD’s.