Look, my gender indentification is none of your business. To continue to make insinuations about it, e.g. “you may not be female” is downright mean. Please stop it.
Why is that mean? If we don’t know what you are, and you refuse, for some bizarre reason, to TELL us, then we have no choice but to conclude that you may or may not be a woman. How is that malicious? I’ve always sort of assumed you’re a woman, but for all I know you could have a ten inch cock. Hell, that could be true for any presumed “woman” on the internet. Don’t take it personally.
Whatever you are, are you hot?
My husband thinks so, after nineteen years, and that’s all that counts. 
To be fair, a lot of Mexican Americans would identify with that.
Edit: Whoops, didn’t realize the thread was 4 pages until I posted. Sorry if this has already been addressed.
Too late, Obama’s already been rode hard and put away wet. Carol’s getting a “Red Hot Obama Mama!” tattoo even as we speak
There have been several posters on this board whose names indicate they are one gender when they are actually another; I wasn’t ‘insinuating’ anything in particular, just genuinely confused. Anyway, no meanness intended, whether you happen to think so or not, and I sincerely apologize for speculating on something that, if we happened to run into each other on the street, wouldn’t even come up as a question. In any event, as I said previously, I honestly don’t care whether you’re male, female, plaid, a dog, forumbot or whatever, and I doubt whether anyone else here really does either.
And here endeth the hijack, as far as I’m concerned.
Do you get offended easily?
Dammit, that tells us nothing! Nothing!
Thanks for very ignorantly painting all Republicans with a very wide brush.
Just how do you propose to stop them? Ever heard of something called the 1st Amendment, by any chance? It gives people the right to free speech, including the right to make a total blithering ass of themselves by buying or selling buttons with offensive messages.
I’m sure you’ll have no trouble pointing to the case law that says the 1st Amendment applies to Republican state conventions.
CMC +fnord!
Speaking of very ignorant…
I specifically singled out the Republican state convention and the RepublicanMarket in my OP.
I didn’t propose to stop them, I said their behavior sickens me.
I never once insinuated they did not have the right to to be racist assholes, I merely pointed out that they were.
Douche.
The OP *specifically * addressed the Texas State Republican Convention, and didn’t say a word about *stopping * them.
Why are you so invested in being offended by the OP that you had to twist it all up like that?
So, genius, you’re arguing that those running the GOP convention are anti First Amendment?
(yes, I know, but Clothahump, only one on the SDMB dumber than Carol probably doesn’t)
-Joe
It’s absolutely beautiful how this thread has come full circle and demonstrated how people on both sides of the fence nurture and protect their precious offense like a newborn child.
This further supports my theory that Clothahump is either a troll-sock of an administrator, or in the SDMB’s hire, to spice up the board.
White Presidents veto bills like this… (mimes signing his name)
But black Presidents veto bills like this. (mimes signing his name)
Are we going to get a Revtim-like[sup]*[/sup] Pit thread about displaying gender?
BTW, anyone else get Chocolate City stuck in their head while reading this thread?
They still call it the White House
But that’s a temporary condition, too.
Gainin’ on ya!
[sup]I’m sorry if I remembered the poster wrong, and do not mean to imply anything negative about Revtim or anyone else. Ain’t no party like a P-Funk party 'cause a P-Funk party don’t stop![/sup]
Crap, it was Leaffan’s thread I was thinking of. Please accept my apologies.
As we all know, this means that all Republicans are racists.
I bet the ones making those buttons were TYPICAL WHITE PEOPLE. =P