I see they’ve gotten to you, too. Soon they might actually make it up to a moderator, and then where would be we be?
Poe us…
I see they’ve gotten to you, too. Soon they might actually make it up to a moderator, and then where would be we be?
Poe us…
Etceter-ah, Etceter-ah, Etceter-ah!
What about the owls? Are they what they seem?
The only way it could be more soundly proven is if he’d written “verified by Snopes”.
And if it didn’t, the Deadpool PSAs would.
Green Lantern.
'Nuff said.
Who?
Only to the extent that a thing made of dough can be said to have been “born.”
One day my log will have something to say about that.
Only to the extent that a thing made of dough can be said to have been “born.”
I’ll bet he won’t giggle if you punch him in the stomach.
Green Lantern.
'Nuff said.
Double plus +1.
Ryan is an American Treasure. For making this awesome movie by default he became an American citizen…
Sigh. Cruz is a natural born citizen. Deal with it.
There is nothing natural about Ted Cruz. And I understand that he has a pimple on his SCOTUS.
What about the owls? Are they what they seem?
Oh fer Og’s sake, you should know they aren’t.
Sigh. Cruz is a natural born citizen. Deal with it.
Holy shit. You’ve been sputtering nonsense so long, I can’t believe it. You’ve apparently just said an accurate statement!
Fuck, this is an auspicious omen. Maybe I should sacrifice a bull.
Hey Blackbag’s back with new stories. I thought the Illuminati had shut it down months ago.
I don’t understand this thread. The posts seem to fall into 4 categories:
But I am not sure which post falls into which category.
I don’t understand this thread. The posts seem to fall into 4 categories:
- Serious, regular division
- Serious, Poe’s Law division
- Sarcastic/tongue in cheek
- Whoosh
But I am not sure which post falls into which category.
The categories each post falls under is determined by some sort of secretly seeded round-robin. Each time you read them they are a different category than last.
Sigh. Cruz is a natural born citizen. Deal with it.
Well, people are asking questions. And as mentioned upthread, why has he not posted his birth certificate online for us to see? Hmmmm?
The categories each post falls under is determined by some sort of secretly seeded round-robin. Each time you read them they are a different category than last.
That explains a lot.
I don’t understand this thread. The posts seem to fall into 4 categories:
- Serious, regular division
- Serious, Poe’s Law division
- Sarcastic/tongue in cheek
- Whoosh
But I am not sure which post falls into which category.
I can categorically say MY posts do fall into a category.
I can categorically say MY posts do fall into a category.
Almost all in the WC column :), as in wacky conspiracy theories, the ones making the site that originated that conspiracy in the OP have a long history or crazy ideas and they even have entries in their site about other conspiracies, like the Kennedy assassination and the most reprehensible ones about the Sandy Hook massacre and other big incidents.
a.k.a. DallasGoldBug Another tragedy, another slew of clinically insane conspiracy theorists claiming that it’s a “...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/us/25tucson.html?_r=3&partner=rss&emc=rss
Some conspiracy Web sites are claiming that the shootings that nearly killed Representative Gabrielle Giffords and did end the lives of a federal judge, a 9-year-old girl and four others never actually took place. One particularly bizarre site, run by a Texas man, says it was all a government hoax that used actors.
Such obviously fantastic claims would usually not merit the attention of law enforcement, but they have in this instance because some believers have been confronting, and alarming, some of the people associated with the case in recent weeks.
Ed Chiarini, who runs the site, identifies himself as an inventor and Web entrepreneur. He could not be reached for comment.
The hoax contention did not surprise Benjamin Radford, a research fellow at the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry, who has written extensively on conspiracy theories.
“The bigger the story is, the more likely it is that someone will consider it a hoax,” Mr. Radford said. “In my experience, there is no belief that is so absurd or self-evidently wrong that someone won’t prescribe to it.”