Andros-
Your hope will be rewarded, but more than likely by me using another USERNAME.
I have brought down the wrath of those who wish to keep me out.
Oh well huh?
-N
Poly: Thanks.
SJ: I thoroughly enjoyed those animated comics! Can’t wait until the next issue is out. Haven’t laughed so hard in quite some time!
I’d like to point something out. Before I do, realize that these are just a few observations I have made, along with the relevant links in case anyone feels like following up.
- The whole stuff with Phaedrus goes down.
- Around that same time, NewtonsApple appears.
- Newt posts in a GD thread about abortion, claiming that his wife still cries herself to sleep at night over an abortion years and years ago. http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum7/HTML/000957.html
- Newt’s wife also likes to get it up the butt. http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/004214.html
- Newt has been on this board since last June under another username. http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/004295.html
- In the same thread in which he admits he’s been here since last June, he asks posters for information about themselves that anyone who has been here for that amount of time could have easily figured out.
- Newt uses LBMB lingo, especially “bump.” http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum3/HTML/002080-2.html
- In this thread, Newt claims to have evidence for a Christian assertion, then when pressed to provide said evidence, does not.
- In these threads, Phaedrus does the exact same thing. http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000521.html http://www.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum7/HTML/000488.html
Now, I’m not claiming that NewtonsApple is Phaedrus. Very little of the evidence seems to point in that direction. However, there is very little consistency to our friend Newt, and I, for one, am beginning to wonder why.
I actually got into a minor argument with Satan when he jumped all over Newt in MPSIMS for seemingly knowing too much. Let me be the first to admit that I may very well have been wrong.
So, Newt, what name were you posting under, and why did you feel the need to change? Most of our regulars who change their usernames post a thread about it in MPSIMS or ATMB, just to let everyone else know who they are. Why the secrecy? And why all the other inconsistency? In light of everything I’ve shown here, I think we need some explanations.
“Buffalo Bills? Oh, yeah. The guys that always snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.” --WallyM7
And while I was composing this, Newt threatens to use another username, even though this is against the rules.
Thank you for helping me prove my point much better than I could have done alone, Newt. Now 'fess up.
Drain Bead, I don’t think they are one in the same. There is distinct differences between Phaedrus writing style and NA’s. Phaedrus, for all of his problems, was articulate if somewhat incomplete. Also, Phaedrus loved posting multiple times, and very long messages. Phaedrus would normally answer multiple people in different posts, rather than answer multiple people in a single post. Phaedrus didn’t seem to have the penchant for violence that NA does.
Granted Phaedrus’ obviously likening to using a persona means that anything is possible, but it seems to me that the underlying persons are not the same.
Nice investigation though.
Monty, Thanks for correcting my proofreading error.
As to “intentionally misleading exaggeration is an intentional lie.” I beg to differ. I cannot possibly understand how you can determine my itentions for using hyperbole.
Going by your own definition–you intentionally mislead other readers by claiming I was a liar because I used hyperbole. Now, what logical deduction can I make about you, based on YOUR logic?
Glitch – I vote for MikeylikesIt and company.
Oh,maybew that we’re both just a couple of fun loving hypocrites?
I second David’s guess. Sigh. I’m never going to find about polygamy in Heaven, am I?
Felice
“There’s always a bigger fish.”
Oh, hell, Felice. Is that all you wanted to know?
The answer is yes, lots and lots of polygamy in heaven.
Unless you don’t want it. Then all polygamy will be banned.
Waste
Flick Lives!
(laugh) Actually, I’m not all that concerned about polygamy in Heaven. One wife would be more than enough for me, thanks. I was more interested in polyandry!
Felice
“There’s always a bigger fish.”
Oh, well, that I’m not qualified to comment on.
Of course, that didn’t stop me earlier, but in the words of a great man, “Oh well, what the hell”.
Waste
Flick Lives!
Felice, this is all I could find: http://ldscn.com/wool/eternalmarriage.shtml
Okay. According to my boyfriend’s faulty memory, he says that a man in heaven can have more than one wife, but a woman cannot have more than one husband. He thinks so. Pretty sure.
Try Google and type in celestial marriage LDS
You get lots of sites where you can hopefully find the answer to your question.
Is there nagging in heaven? 'Cus if there is, no man would want more than one wife. Hell, a lot of men wouldn’t even want one!
The wife getting on your nerves lately, David?
Of course there is. What kind of a heaven would it be if a wife couldn’t nag her husband?
Silly person…
Felice
“There’s always a bigger fish.”
Don’t go jumpin’ to conclusions, Orangey (I know, you’re just hoping so I’ll come to you).
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Felice:
What kind of a heaven would it be if a wife couldn’t nag her husband?
[QUOTE]
So woman’s heaven is man’s hell, eh?