If I’m ever emperor of the world I’m going to outlaw all analogies in political debates. What a person’s singular artistic vision has to do with a message board conversation is beyond me.
An artist is presenting his own version of a work. He has modified the original work. This is something that has been done over and over and over again in all fields of art.
You find this particular modification stupid. Perhaps it is. I don’t know, not having seen the work, but it sounds like it could be overly didactic. That’s your judgement and you are certainly entitled to it.
However, the Artist found a venue for his work. The proprietors did not object to the content. They did not say “Hey, this bit with the heads of religious figures is pretty dumb.” It wasn’t until they were threatened–by a single anonymous note–that they wanted to change the play. They weren’t changing it because they thought it was dumb, they were changing to placate bullys and thugs.
What you and jsgoddess and dropzone and the theater owners fail to realize is that once you start placating thugs, there’s no stopping them. These fanatics now know that if anything threatens their delicate sensibilities, all they have to do is threaten violence and they can shut it down.
Also, are you saying that any art that challenges religion is trolling? Or is it only trolling if it’s bad art? Should all art that criticizes and challenges religion be banned, or just art that criticizes Islam?
And until that happens, as long as the ostensible troll’s actions do not extend beyond the designated behavioral boundaries, posting privileges will not be revoked, and said individual’s status as troll remains merely ostensible.
Apparently yes. E.g. according to two of Germany’s leading newspapers, Die Zeit and FAZ (both German), the minister of the interior of Berlin denied that there had been a concrete threat.
It has been reported that they had received a call from a concerned (presumably non-muslim) viewer.
And I, as a hypothetical business owner, know that it is not necessarily in my business’s interest for me to take a heroic stance in the face of fanaticism. I appreciate your argument but I’d rather you didn’t drag me, my business, and my customers into your crusade.
Excellent! Now I, as a hypothetical Muslim fanatic, know where you stand. My next demand is that you fire your Jewish employees, and enforce a dress code consistent with Islamic principles, mandating that all female employees wear a hijab.
Oh wait. I’ve just noticed you’re operating a theater. A theater? We’re not having that. Close down at once! Or, if you wish to remain open, only perform works pleasing to the prophet, denouncing the Zionists and their American slaves.
Well, you haven’t actually had a first demand yet, hypothetical or otherwise. As far as I can tell, Islam has been brought into this discussion by non-Muslims only.
Right, which as you point out, makes the story more disturbing. A bully’s ultimate goal is to have his victims so cowed they will do his bidding on their own.
The riots over the Danish cartoons have gotten people cowed enough that they will obey the Islamic precept not to depict the prophet, without any actual threats. Time will tell what the next demand will be.
I think we in the Western world had better decide just how much power we are going to allow Islam , to lord over us. I find it disturbing that a bunch of ignorant, backward people can dictate to Western nations, about what they can publish in newspapers, see in movies and plays, etc. I’ll change my mind when islamic counties allow freedom of speech.
I find it more disturbing because it is assigning a position to the Muslim community, then assuming that it’s true, and then reacting to it. And that then causes people like you to blame the Muslims for this without them having done it.
People can only be held accountable for the actions they take, not the actions some hypothetical could have them taking at some point in the future that you would object to.
That is meant only partly sarcastically. It seems as though they’ve succeeded in terrifying people to the point that they’re censoring themselves. What next?
And I, the hypothetical theater owner, reserve the right to tell you to, “Bite me. I made a concession because I agreed that the scene in the opera was unnecessarily inflammatory and offensive (and I had a couple operas that would probably do better business anyway to replace that one), but I have a business to run. If you want to make any more changes in the way things work in this country you’re going to have to go through the same process every other jerk with an axe to grind has to go through. I suggest buying airtime on an obscure UHF station and get donations until you have enough to buy a bunch of politicians, but keep in mind that there are lots of other people doing the same thing and lots of them won’t agree with you.”
Okay, that’s the red-blooded American legislative process but I assume it’s much the same in Germany.
It’s not assigning a position to “the Muslim Community.” It’s noting that said community contains a fairly large minority of violent fanatics who must apparently be placated at the cost of free expression. You aren’t saying that the Muslim community contains no violent fanatics, are you?
I have absolutly no idea what this means. Politicians? UHF stations? What does any of this have to do with standing up to fanatics.
Tell it to Theo van Gogh. Oh, wait, you can’t. He’s dead. He can’t possibly have been murdered by a Muslim fanatic, since, according to you, they don’t exist. Maybe it was a Sasquatch that killed him.
Theo van Gogh was gay, by the way. The Netherlands has long been one of the most open societies in the world, and one of the least homophobic. But like many western countries, they went too far and started naiively letting Muslims immigrate.
Today, for the first time in a couple of generation, gay and lesbian Netherlanders have known fear and gay-bashing. NOT at the hands of the Dutch people who remain as tolerant as ever, but because of gangs of Muslim immigrant men who make it their duty to cruise around gay neighbourhoods beating up and harassing gays.
Reports from gay orgaizations in the Netherlands say it is getting worse all the time.
What he was actually saying is that the Muslim community contains a “fairly large minority” of those violent fanatics, which is to say, more than the average large group right now.
Feel free to give a cite if you have one, but I think this is a problem Europe is having and not one the United States is likely to have. I think the Muslims who are coming here generally do want to assimilate, while that doesn’t seem to be the case in Europe.
