That was the headline that linked to this article (which has no mention of the b-word, except in the tag in the address bar). Is ‘boner’ now acceptable, at least in celeb articles, or did a lazy journo forget to change the temporary headline?
It’s acceptable in Batman comics: http://www.superdickery.com/seduction/3.html
Why shouldn’t it be acceptable when talking about Paris Hilton?
Incidentally, the headline’s been changed now.
The headline in the thread title only linked to the article (which has a different headline). Other links include ‘Ashley and Lance Mack Strong’ and ‘Porn Stocks Worth, Um, Watching’ so either MSN’s getting lax/creative to draw in readers or a writer’s being cute.