…and should have been in the Pit.
Not ad hominem - acceptable in GD.
Should have been in the Pit.
Unlike the two respondents above who broke forum rules, Lobohan did the right thing. I’m sorry you find the rules so difficult to understand.
Shame, you’re such fun.
mswas, I have decided to become a theist (hypothetically) just so I can tell you to go to hell. Isn’t that proper place for someone such as yourself who only feigns proper behavior under threat but inwardly truly feels compelled toward evil?
Sweet mother of fuck, can we stop calling every post we don’t like an act of trollery? Yes, the thread in question was vastly ignorant, but he clearly wanted to discuss the subject and was at least somewhat open to debate, seeing as how he opened a thread in GD about it.
For fuck’s sake, stop reflexively calling peoples trolls when they post something when it’s simply ignorant or an unpopular opinion. Not everybody is as smart as you are and holds all the popular opinions you do.
What **Revtim ** said. “Troll” is just becoming a word meaning “someone I think is an asshole” or “someone who posts fucked up opinions”.
Can we just call them assholes, or tell them their opinions are fucked up and leave “troll” to its original meaning?
I find people like mswas and “James from Charleston, MO” (about 1:58 into this) disturbing. “Assholes” or “fucked up” work too.
I started this thread because he’s a fucking idiot. Glad I could clarify that for you. 
Dude, reread the OP in that thread. He was constructing a strawman that would scare all the crows out of North America. Those aren’t his opinions, he was by asking the question looking to piss people off.
Can we still call it trolling when people use false premises to stir up a debate? Rather than using an honest set of questions, using lies and half-truths to frame the argument isn’t just ignorant, it’s goading.
Or are you one of those folks that think people don’t lie, they ‘mispeak’?
If he’s purposely lying, he’s trolling. But in this case, I see no reason believe he’s not simply a truthful idiot. His ignorant-ass OP is pretty typical of what a lot people think about atheism.
Mswas has been around these boards quite a while. I just find it hard to believe he or she really thought the OP was an accurate picture of the way atheists think. That would require some amazing density.
I have no trouble believing in amazing density, especially about what people think of atheism.
You’re right. And, if you’ll notice, I immediately recanted and apologized. Funny that nobody seems to have noticed that.
However, I’m a bit confused. The OP basically accused atheists of being evil or psychopathic… and yet, calling him on that is against the rules. As I said later in the thread- if the OP had been a guest instead of a board regular, what would the immediate assumption have been?
And since every one of the points mswas propped up has been repeatedly refuted in previous threads, well… shouldn’t mswas be held to a higher standard than a guest?
Ask him if he’s posting while stoned again.
Knowing that about him sorta took the fun out of the discourse, for me.
The questions and arguments are legit, but with the way he worded his post, I wondered if mswas was doing an imitation of what he thinks Der Trihs sounds like.
I’ll also just assume mswas was posting high again. Or “playing Devil’s Advocate” again, I’m sure.
Then mswas should keep the night job - I can do a more convincing bizarro-DT with my fist and some lipstick…
Should I ever assemble a musical ensemble, I shall call it thus.
“OMG he called atheists evil! Troll! Troll!! OMFG TROLL!!!111!1!!”
Lighten the fuck up, people. Seriously.
No, it’s more like: “It looks like he’s posted an OP consisting of a patently ridiculous straw man that he’s surely not stupid enough to believe. If he’s done this just to provoke an angry response, and not to have an honest debate, then he’s trolling.”
Hope that helps.
So quit your bitching and go destroy his argument in GD if it’s so full of holes.