You started a thread about whether or not society has a responsibility to accept transgendered individuals, a topic that is rather dear to a few posters. One can accept a great debate exloring this issue and it enlightened many folks.
The fact that you were not able to see the point that others were arguing is not a problem.
Your nonsensical demands that you be referred to as a dragon or a female by one particular poster, while strange are not pitworthy in themselves.
Your claims of not believing in materialism but insisting that gender was determined by an ever changing set of materialistic requirements isn’t pity worthy by its lonesome either.
Nor your view that gender reassignment surgery was a ‘luxury’ procedure and that they should just suck it up, your defense of bigots, your warped view that male and female have static definitions, your claim of Trannydar, your in acceptance of common definitions, your inability to back up your arguments with factual citations or your claim that gender reassignment surgery uses “leather vaginas”.
But all of that in addition to the fact that you are purposefully arguing contrary to your beliefs and attempting to decieve the rest of the posters is reprehensable. I’ve got no problem playing the Devil’s Advocate, but doing so in an underhanded manner is uncalled for. There’s no good reason you couldn’t tell us in your OP that you were doing so. I would have been fine with it. Rather we’ve got 8 pages of trying to cut through your nonsensical ramblings and intentionally obfuscated point of view.
Fuck off and go polymorph yourself into an asshat. Finally the outward appearance would match the soul that lurks within. We need more people to question authority and complacency. However we’ve got more than enough dishonest shit eaters to last us centuries.
I’m terribly sorry, but polymorph only turns yourself into a sheep, not an asshat. So, you can pit him for misusing the word as well as everything listed in the OP.
I have to admit I didn’t read the original thread but scrolling past the title always gave me bad thoughts.
“Do we have a responsibility to accept transgendered individuals?”
NO! They should be shunned and ridiculed at all opportunities. They’re not allowed in our tree house because they like, have cooties and stuff. BTW, do they still make cooties? You know, those cute plastic bugs with the yellow eyes, legs, and antennas. Those were awesome back in the day. Time to do some google research/buy some off Amazon…
kidchameleon I understood the arguments people were making perfectly. Most of them were ad hominems against some strata of society people thought I belonged to but didn’t.
It’s not my fault people are idiots and cannot think outside of their presupplied arguments.
Oh no! This topic is near and dear to posters, OMFG, and I dared question it! The notion of God is near and dear to people too and I see it shit on on a daily basis. BFD, get over it.
Arguing a position contrary to one you hold personally is just how debate goes sometimes.
Shifting goalposts, arbitrarily redefining words, presenting unclear arguments, presenting (when clear) inconsistent arguments, and yelling “ad hominem!” when challenged on these things is not. You’re a shmuck, mswas. You debate so poorly Gonzalez would convince Congress torture should be legal if you were presenting the counterarguments.
Perhaps, but none of the rest of us could because you were lying about it and responding often with poor syntax. You’re a Mendoza poster with a Barry Bond’s personality. You make Paris Hilton look witty and urbane. Shit stains lament among themselves why you are giving them a bad name. Go crawl back under a rock, you wife-beating anti-semite.
kidchameleon Also, you’re going to have to do more than bring up a sin from my past I’ve come to terms with and some bullshit post I made when I was intentionally trying to get banned to give your penis pump the juice it needs.
Good one.