[QUOTE=OtakuLoki]
I certainly support getting away from steam radiators. They have some advantages, but not so much for the individual home owner. Hot water heat* may be good for you, but if you do that make sure you treat the water. Not pushing you towards it, just offering it up as another option.
One question/comment: If you’re planning to go the forced air route - do you have ducting installed already where the heat can go, or would you have to have that installed as well as the heating system? Also, what would you do with the existing steam piping and radiators in the house - leave them in place, or remove them? (IOW, going from low pressure steam to forced air heat isn’t going to a simple transparent change - you will probably be looking at a good deal of structural remodeling on the house to do it. Of course you’d probably be looking at the same for hot water heat, too. And steam piping doesn’t last forever - so it may be time to think about replacing it, even if you do stay with steam. Yes, I’m juuust full of cheerful thoughts.)
My personal gut feeling - if I were in your shoes and had the money for the investment I’d really look at a ground source heat pump system - heating and cooling in one system, and generally very cheap to operate. But if you look at danceswithcats’s description of it, you can see why it’s not a cheap installation. OTOH, look into local, state and federal home owner’s incentives for moving to more efficient heating/cooling options - you may be able to qualify for grants, low interest loans, or tax benefits.
*For anyone confused by that term, hot water heat uses a primary heat source (coal, oil, gas, or even a heat pump) to heat water, still in liquid phase, and then pump the heated water through the building where the heat radiates from the piping to the rooms. This is a closed cycle, so the water then returns to the heat source (Often called a boiler. In part because they’re often very similar in construction to what’s known as a fire-tube boiler.) to be heated again. Some advantages include: being able to keep the system filled year-round, so there’s no need to vent it at the start of every heating system; the water in the circulating system can also be used to transfer heat out of the living spaces for chilling by a central A/C unit; the system is easier to keep sealed than a steam cycle heat system, and consequently - easier to keep chemically treated - with the advantages in longer system life for the piping in the circulating loop. Disadvantages include: the need for a ciculating pump, as well as the heat source, which provides another potential failure point for the heating system - not a dangerous failure point, just one thing that may go wrong, and leave your house without heat; and the fact that if a leak develops it will generally do much more water damage than a leak in a similar steam system might cause.
[/QUOTE]
As for the existing steam piping, I would remove it. And the duct work? I am remodeling the house anyway. Almost everything is ripped out. So putting the duct work in is no big problem.
And I am reading up on ground source heat pump.
Thank you.