My Omnibus Fox News Rant

So, this morning I’m at a Ford dealership to have my car serviced because National Tire and Battery completely screwed up when putting snow tires on my car. I have those locking lug nuts that take a special key to remove them, and NTB 1. broke one of the nuts, 2. broke the key, and 3. ultimately (although this was not clear until I was at the Ford dealer for a while) had broken the shaft on the hub. NTB’s excuse for this exceptional stupidity: “Whoever put the wheels back on last tightened the lug nuts too tight.”

Anyway, while I’m sitting in the lounge I’m forced to listen to/watch Fox News’ morning programming. I can better appreciate why Fox viewers are both so angry and so ill-informed. Much of the discussion was on the omnibus spending bill, the thousands of earmarks in it, and the fact that Republican senators are really angry about the bill, and about the fact that they haven’t had any time to look at the bill. Fox went back to this issue repeatedly, interspersed with discussion of another topic (see below). They had clips of Mitch McConnell, they had clips of John McCain. They cut to opinions from people on other Fox News shows. They asked Kelsey Grammer his opinion on the earmarks in the omnibus spending bill. All of this was driven by a narrative: imply that Democrats have loaded this bill up with pork and are trying to ram it down the Republicans throats. I’m sitting there as they play McConnell and his outraged indignation, saying to myself, “I’m sure that if I looked it up, I would see that McConnell himself has added an earmark to this thing.” Sure enough, he has at least one in there - $650,000 for a genetics lab. While I’m watching, Fox does not once even speculate that any Republicans, let alone any of the ones who are so outraged about earmarks have put their own earmarks in.

One of the other big stories Fox covered over and over during the hour I watched – a shooting that occurred at a school board meeting in Florida. Some guy brought a gun to a meeting, ended up firing the gun at school board members, was himself shot by a security guard, and ended up punching his own ticket. Sure, this story is worth a mention. But they had video! So we had to watch over and over, get updates! from police briefings, talk to multiple witnesses. It’s bad enough that they had to magnify this one incident way out of proportion just because they had video, but they also kept repeating that, because the gunman fired from eight feet away at a council member and missed, God had interceded on his behalf. First they had the potential victim saying this. Then the hosts repeated it. Then they played a clip of the police spokesperson saying it.

All I can say is I’m pleased that God likes old, white Florida school board guys. It’s too bad he can’t spare any time to protect the thousands of others who are going to be murdered by handguns this year.

I know this is a pointless rant. At least, like I said, I have better understanding of why Fox viewers are the way that they are.

If it makes you feel any better, I was watching MSNBC and they had very similar coverage of the shooting. It was pretty chilling to actually watch the guy firing shots at people, even though the people were just offscreen.

Am I bad person for laughing when they showed video of the lady sneaking up behind him and hit him with her purse?

Can’t speak about the earmark thing on FOX. The only time I watch FoxNews is Chris Wallace’s Sunday talk show.

It is sensational, and yes it was chilling. Your description is interesting, because the Fox video included the people he was firing at in the picture. After his first shot, the councilman doubles over, making it look entirely like he was hit.

Well, since I was watching Fox, I got to see an interview with that woman. Sure, she was brave, and she acknowledged that it was a pretty stupid thing to do. It was terrifying, and her actions could have easily led to someone getting killed. Now, we have the benefit of hindsight to know that nobody ended up getting killed by this guy, but if one of those guys had jumped up to try to help her when she was down, I can only imagine that he would be dead.

You should know that the Republicans are outraged, outraged!! about the earmarks and will be doing their best to defeat this bill.

Actually, I think they did show another shot (no pun intended) where the person being shot at was in the frame.

Hey, it takes a lot of practice to be that outraged!

I believe they were channeling Jules Winnfield. (Loud and violent)

Jules: “We should be fuckin’ dead, man”

Vincent: “I know, we was lucky”

J: “Oh, no, no, no, that shit wasn’t luck”

V: “Yeah, maybe”

J: “This was divine intervention. You know what divine intervention is?”"

V: “I think so, that means God came down from heaven and stopped the bullets”

J: “That’s right. That’s exactly what it means. God came down from heaven and stopped these motherfuckin’ bullets”

Faux News was on at the gym yesterday. The was a watermark graphic countdown on the screen: DAYS LEFT TIL BUSH TAX CUTS EXPIRE: 16

Which, when you think about should be viewed as god giving your lifestyle a big thumbs up, rather than him telling you to change and start being good.

As for the OP, well, what you witnessed was the sound of democracy being assraped by the free market. Enjoy it, everyone.

-Joe

The school board shooting thing was all over the news everywhere. Mainly because … there was video! TV news loves to show stuff, much more than tell you stuff you have to, you know, imagine in your mind’s eye or whatever. So, yeah … I saw lotsa coverage on ABC this morning. It was everywhere, not just Fox.

However … I can imagine they played up the “God saved me” line of sensationalism. I heard that on the radio, and I thought the same thing Hentor did. Good thing God was looking out for those Florida school board members!! Hope He didn’t miss anything going on in Afghanistan or Ontario or Somalia while He was hanging out in Panama City!

But to the big issue of the pitting … as Hentor mentions in the OP: “All of this was driven by a narrative: imply that Democrats have loaded this bill up with pork and are trying to ram it down the Republicans throats.” This is what drives me the most nuts about Fox. They have a very specific, very determined point of view in how they present the day’s events, and they make no bones about ramming that point of view down the viewers’ throats. “Fair and balanced”? “We report, you decide”? My ass! Once the decision-makers at Fox have their narrative of the day, you hear it over and over and over and over again.

I’m not surprised so many Fox News viewers really believe there were WMDs, or Saddam was behind 9/11, or Obama’s a Kenyan Muslim socialist, or the Democrats are out to sabotage this wonderful tax-cut bill that will rain puppies and kittens down upon every American … that kind of message is implied (or sometimes outright stated) 24/7 on Fox’s news coverage. It’s ridiculous.

And I also believe Megyn Kelly is Satan’s consort. Just sayin’.

Kelsey Grammer?? WTF? :dubious: What’s next? Are they going to ask Michael Richards about ACORN?

Anyway this sounds like it’d make a good Jon Stewart piece. I hope he takes it up.

The ONLY way to watch Fox News is with the sound off, because the do have exceptional looking news babes.

I suppose a lot of Yanks imagine God himself as resembling, “old, white Florida school board guys”–or you know, their grandfathers. A conservative religion is likely ancestor worship in part.

“Dear Lord: next time, could you just not send the guy with the gun in the first place? Thanks and amen.”

But how would he prove that he exists & loves old, white Florida school board guys?

At least Killface fixed global warming. So it looks like Killface: 1, God 0.

-Joe

I decided a few years ago to stop watching news programs – of whatever political bent – that make me feel outraged. It was bad for my health. I feel a lot better now.

Just out of curiosity, what is the ratio of Democratic pork to Republican pork in the bill? If it’s roughly the same, I say shame on Fox. If it’s heavily skewed toward Democrats, then maybe not so much.

MSNBC was doing a blurb on pork in the bill just a few minutes ago, but they didn’t identify the source of the pork-- just the state. Actually, they may have, but I have it on in the background while I’m working (and posting here), so I could have missed it.

According to Fox News, Assange is the World’s Most Notorious Hacker.

Taxpayers for Common Sense counted 39,294 earmark requests worth more than $130 billion. The breakdown:

House: D - $51 billion; R - $1 billion
Senate: D - $55 billion; R - $22 billion; I - $950 million

Apparently House Republicans had agreed to some sort of moratorium on requesting earmarks, which was observed by all but four members.

Not that it really matters anyway, as only about $8 billion worth of requests made it into the Senate budget bill, accounting for less than 1% of the budget.

What makes no sense to me is that they would kick in some pork for a guy like Mitch McConnell, ostensibly to get his support, when they know he’s going to rail against it anyway. They may as well take it out of the budget and give his state the middle finger if he won’t support it regardless.

A new poll claims to show that people (both Dem and Rep) who watch Fox News are significantly more misinformed.

Leaked emails show that a top Fox news editor instructed his staff to always mention that global warming has skeptics and to refer to the public option as the government option (warning: lefty site).

Fox has no intention of providing news, just commentary, which is fine if they’d call it Fox Opinion instead of Fox News.

And it’s not like removing the earmarks will save that $8 billion either - it’s all appropriated money. The earmarks just direct it to be spent in a particular way.

It was rather funny seeing two GOP senators railing against the earmarks in a bill to which they had added millions in their own earmarks. At some point the dissonance has to kick in, right? Right?