3.1415926535897932384626433832795 - Do we now have to number every post uniquely? Cause, you know, there’s only so many numbers.
7-11 twenty fo’ seven
I think donkeyoatey has answered your question Susma. And anyother question anyone could pose.
43 I can see this working. Wasn’t there a thread where people voluntarily numbered their posts?
Only instead of numbers they used letters, and they used a revolving numbering scheme.
And the letter was used as the first letter of the first word of the post. And the posts were rather mundane and pointless.
Oh, and the thread was locked in the end.
Never mind.
43A
Yes, it’s kinda humble, and sure there’s a cockroach problem, but 42A is home to ME!
Or, indeed, 43A. The ‘A’ is for AAAAAUGH! 
- This would be my OP then, is that right?
What’s the postal address of the Chicago Reader?
- As the OP of this thread, I’d like to compain most bitterly that not only has my OP not been answered, the thread has been hijacked to Pluto.
- And not only that, the post sorting function is broken. Again.
-1. Nice try, but OPs are numbered 0, as you will see if you read post 14 to this thread.
- The OP of a thread is always numbered “1”, contrary to what some might believe.
- I read the post that you refered to, Achernar, and it agrees with me.
À[sub]0[/sub]