In fact, some of them actually turned out pretty good.
28 and 44 are especially good.
See them here.
[sub]And really, any compliments will be greatly appreciated, even if they are just out of pity on the unfortunate joke that life played on my face.[/sub]
Oh, yes, for those that know me, my name hasn’t changed, he just posted my brother’s name up there for some odd reason or another. . .the photographer’s kind of an odd guy, so I won’t attempt to explain why.
Well, your pictures look much better than my senior pictures looked. I looked incredibly constipated and as attractive as that my sound it just wan’t a good look for me.
I kinda wish I’d gotten senior pictures. I figured it was waaaay too much money to spend for pictures that would probably look like crap (because they were pictures of me, c’mon) and nobody would want anyway. So my mom just used some of the pictures she took of me pre-prom (didn’t get actual prom pictures either… no date, no point) and took 'em to the Kodak Picture Maker at Wal-Mart and made copies and used them. But still, would’ve been nice…
But, back to topic, I think they came out well, Jim. Love the haircut, BTW. Very Beatles-esque.
28 is really good. By far the best of the bunch, I think.
You’re very good-looking. I predict you will get a lot of positive response in this thread. You have a very appealing bone structure, a very strong face, and your eyes are amazing. There, I’ve said it.
You know what, a lot of people say that, Antares, but it wasn’t what I was going for. I’m not real sure what I was going for, to tell the truth, but it wasn’t Beatles. I’m glad it got into something, though, and to the level of gods such as the Beatles. . .I knew there was a reason I’ve had this haircut for most of my high school career!
[sub]. . .and my mom says all that Paul McCartney stuff will go to my head. . .[/sub]
Oh, you’re adorable, you sweet little thing! (pinches JimSox5’s cheeks like an old auntie). My senior pictures were a bit stiffer—of course, we had to have our heads in vices, because the camera exposure time was an hour back then . . .
Thank you, Snoopy, I don’t really hate how I look. There some things I would like to improve, but I guess in reality, I’m fairly happy with how I look.
And trust me, Eve, there were some pictures that didn’t get posted because it was so sunny and bright that I couldn’t keep my head in one position enough to keep it all in the shade.
Well, Mudshark, around here, there’s only two photo studios that will submit things straight to the yearbook. And I didn’t go to either one of those because those both cost about $150. These I got taken for $50 and whatever it takes to print them (a 5x7 is $1) I think I made a good choice.