who paid for her fertilization?
She claims she paid for it out of her savings.
Of course, if you believe anything she says, I’ll sell you a bridge.
She had some settlement from an injury.
Heard (no confirmation) that she was supposed to be too injured to work while carrying all these kids. Wouldn’t be at all surprising if her injury settlement was based on fraud.
Or, alternatively, she was hoping the tab would be picked up by the American media circus that makes reality TV out of the Duggars.
I don’t think that having litters will become so popular with women that we need to legislate against it.
mother of the year material for having all 14 seperately :rolleyes:
Over, apparently, thirty years; six over the '70’s, three in the '80’s, the rest in the '90’s. I think, given that she didn’t have to take time out to hoe & weed, cook & clean, she could squeeze a few minutes for them.
So which is it, God love her for having so many children to take care of - when you can afford them and space out your children over three decades years, or :rolleyes:?
I’m with Indyellen on this one – to me, this is a case of hoarding, no different than the crazy cat/dog lady. If you listen to Suleman (and replace “baby” with “dog” or “cat”), you basically have a hoarder who can’t help but collect infants and/or children that she can’t properly care for. Unlike pets, there’s governmental assistance for people, so that’s a start… but note that she’s in total denial about the help she does receive.
Total fruitcake. Hopefully the kids won’t need therapy by the time they’re 10…
Sorry, but I’m pulled. And please do not confuse this woman with my feeling for Mia Farrow. Two different situations.
Anybody think the Octomom is a lesbian?
Be pretty funny if a Gay Mom outbred that Duggar puppyfarm.
LOL Must have put a dozen nannies through college.
I have my doubts that her intentions were pure when it came to having these babies but she most definitely HAS been seeking media attention and money. She has a publicist for crying out loud. And the website seems to be down now but she had one up asking for donations. Here’s a cached version of it:
And she should; she’s a rich woman. She should pay people to change diapers, dust knick-knacks, and paint her toe nails. Charity is all well and good, but workers have to make a living; god bless the rich when they pay the poor well and often.
The title of this thread gives me the creeps, mainly because I can all too easily imagine “Nadya Suleman and Her Octuplets” performing Mr. Sandman, or maybe even You’re Having My Baby.
It would be preferable, if the baby-raising costs get too high and AIG doesn’t want to underwrite a corporate sponsorship, for Nadya and the entire brood to join Ringling Bros. Circus. They could replace an elephant troupe and PETA would be happy, or at least a bit less demented.
What’s that got to do with anything? Seriously, dude.
Oh, and I vote nuttier than a salmonella infested peanut factory. Even her family has said so. Her father has gone back to friggin’ IRAQ in order to support the family-and, I suspect, to get away from all the chaos.
Well, I think the nature of her invitro impregnation, Divorcee status, Anonymous donor, obsession with Angelina Jolie, and Earth Godess Motherhood would at first glance point towards possible Lesbianism or even Bisexual tendencies. It may or may not be true, but the speculation exists.
Personally, I’d Love it. Shut up a whole bunch of bigots.
There are enough issues surrounding the whole case. And the hell it would shut up the bigots. It would only give them fuel-see! See those horrid, immoral perverts! Taking advantage of the system, unnatural, blah blah blah.
But I’ll let someone else address that.
I dont understand why the pro-life battalion hasn’t made her their poster child, put her on salary, and be willing to support her and her [del]circus[/del] children until they are through college.
They only care about them in the womb. Once they’ve been born, they’ve served their purpose.