Naked Tribes and Sexual Arousal

Anticipation and imagination is also part of it. Many a year ago, I worked as a pool repairman. One day my partner and I went to a house to fix da pool. On the way around the house, we ran into the 17-y.o.'ish daughter, who was wearing a towel. Waaaaay hot. We talked for a bit, then we went on to the pool and she went back to her sunbathing. She removed her towel to reveal a teeny tiny bikini. Nowhere near as hot as the towel.
I tell this story to men, they get it immediately. Most of the women I tell this story to don’t get it at all.

Sua

I sort of talked about this before when mentioning the flick THE NAKED PREY.

ishmintingas, give me one example of how they would be able to show bare assed naked people to you in US print or TV.
Thats one reason you see them wearing something. duh.

How cooperative of the natives. “We’re going to try and show this documentary in the US, so would you be so kind as to cover up your naughty bits.”

Please.

I don’t understand your question – nor am I sure what you mean by “US print”–newspapers? magazines? books?

I read about the Amazonian vaginal crack-enhancing string in books on anthropology I found in a university library, books published by academic presses. There were drawings of the string, photos of women wearing it, and interviews with tribal men who lamented that women weren’t wearing the strings the way they used to.

As for the film The Emerald Forest, that was a theatrical release and I saw it on rented video. Since many cable channels these days show total nudity, I don’t know what was the point of your post.

Anyway, there are very few nude tribes left in the world, none at all outside Amazonia. Modernization has resulted in most of them wearing the castoff rags of the scum of civilization instead of the proud dignity of their naked skin. Aggressive governments in Sudan, greedy land grabbers and prospectors in Amazonia have been destroying their habitat & traditional way of life and committing genocide. Reducing them from a people in harmony with their natural environment and skilled in the lore of plants and animals to merely the lowest despised rung on the scale of our fucked-up modern civilization, fit only for rags and menial labor, alcoholism and prostitution instead of their unique intimate knowledge of their fast-disappearing environment.

ishmintingas, there was a time, probably 70’s when they would show completely naked natives on tv, films & magazines, but not naked white people.

O.K., I have been married for about six months and lived with my now-husband for over a year before that. In our case, we go around naked a lot when getting ready for work, or just hanging around the house (with the drapes closed, of course). The only time these situation have become sexy is if one of us says something about it or makes a proposition. Maybe this is what groups of naked or semi-nude people do? It not the exposed skin that causes arousal, but suggestions and erotic talk that gets them going.

There are a couple pictures of women wearing the genital string belt published in the article “Brazil’s Waurá Indians”, National Geographic, January 1966, p. 142-143. I think there were a few other National Geographic articles in the 1960s that showed it too.

ishmintingas was correct in his reply. While you won’t see totally naked people on CBS or any of the other major networks (With a notable exception . . . when * Schindler’s List * was aired unedited) you can see plenty of nekkid folks on PBS when they run documentaries on other cultures. TLC and Dicovery Channel often run documentaries on the human body in which they show nudity, as well as The History Channel’s documentary * History Of Sex. * The list could go on and on.

Print media is also not shy about nudity. * National Geographic * comes to mind as a primary example.

It also depends on your definition of nudity. The television program * ER * had a bit of flack a few years ago when it showed a young woman’s naked breasts. Their arguement was that the nudity was not salacious (the young woman had just had surgery to remove a cancerous lum, IIRC) and the furor died down rather quickly. * NYPD Blue * showed a man’s nude buttocks on a few occasions as well.

As a further comment on naked people/sexual arousal:

Opinions on what is erotic varies greatly throughout cultures and time. In the Victorian era of extreme prudery, the sight of a woman’s exposed ankle was enough to get men hot and bothered because women wore long, concealing dresses, and a lady could only show the tips of her shoes. It’s the RESTRICTION of nudity which makes it erotic. It’s, in a way, the forbidden fruit.

I’m sure a man from a Muslim country where women are concealed head-to-toe, and had never been exposed to Western culture and modes of dress, would consider an exposed face, or arm, or hell, even a shoulder to be erotic, simply because it isn’t what he’s used to seeing.

While in Amazonia, a guy sees a woman’s breasts every day, to the point where they become as “natural” a part of her as her face, and are no more erotic than seeing the back of a woman’s hand.

Just as a sort of example: In * Memoirs of a Geisha * (which is one of the more accurate portrayals of the geisha world, I’ve read) one of the geisha explains that the point of the white makeup is to make men more aware of the naked skin beneath. The geisha would leave a tiny margin of skin around the painted mask to exaggerate the effect. So covering what is common to us, the naked skin of the face, actually made the common erotic.

If you’ve ever been around these tribes, as I have, you quickly see that only the youngest breasts are arousing.
They don’t wait long for the first child, and the breast break down quickly at that point.

I disagree thoroughly, sorry. My lover’s 40, and has fairly large breasts. They began heading south before she was 20. ( And, before both kids ) Personally ( and, arousal is purely a personal thing) I find them wildly arousing- because they’re attached to her, AND because they’re sexy :smiley:

Cartooniverse

Lissa, you’re right about erotic zones of the body being culturally defined.

There was an interesting Tamil film from South India, Rosappu Ravikkaikari (1979). Set in the 1920s, it told a story set in a village where the traditional way of life had not changed for thousands of years. The women wore saris with no blouse underneath. Sometimes the sari would shift and expose a bare breast, but no one minded as that was thought normal. Then one day a young villager marries a wife from the big city and she comes to live in the village. She wears a blouse and a petticoat under her sari, and the villagers think something must be wrong with her. They assume she’s a loose woman because she wears these extra adornments instead of the plain simple sari. One village woman gets ideas: she tries wearing a blouse and goes for a walk. Some guys ambush her and attempt to rape her because they thought she was asking for it with this alluring new fashion.

So in old-fashioned South India, wearing more clothing, covering the breasts, was considered immoral. Wearing less clothing with occasional breast exposure was the sign of being morally upright and decent.

Recall from the Bible, when Judah’s daughter-in-law Tamar planned a stratagem to seduce him and get with child by him. She disguised herself as an harlot. How? She wore one of those all-enveloping Middle Eastern veils, like a chador, covering even her face.

The harlots of that time wore more clothing instead of less, to appear sexy.

Today I found one answer to the OP:

“The source of energy that triggers sexual arousal varies from culture to culture. Because we are so accustomed to clothing, our sexual arousal is triggered by its removal. Since Aborigines wear no clothing, they define the cause of sexual arousal differently. For the Aborigines, subtle qualities of atmosphere and natural elements are considered the hidden hand of beings who triggered their sexual appetites. A gentle wind wafting through the pubic hair of a young girl is seen as a natural spirit force inducing the current of erotic energies to flow.”

–Robert Lawlor, Voices of the First Day: Awakening in the Aboriginal Dreamtime, p. 209-211.