Based on some ongoing threads in GD, CS & the Pit, I’ve become overly aware of national/ ethnic stereotypes used for humorous purposes, and the people who whine about them.
On one hand, we have the French (stereotype: dirty, anti-semetic, self-loathing cowards who are only good at making wine(whine?) and cheese). One Canadian website is devoted to stamping out “French bashing” “racist” “Hate Speech”, including a Liquid PlumR commercial that depicts a drain clogging hairball being magically transported to fall on the heads of a French (or Quebecois) couple having a romantic dinner (Miquelon’s latest campaign- May 2nd). In their FAQ’s, they unironically state that
One of their own examples of this high-minded critique is
I don’t have a problem with this American caricature. I even used a similar one in GD (that I swear I made up before seeing this “Monsieur Sylvestre” character). I got quite a few chuckles out of reading most of the site, but a few things left me wondering “Do people actually think this way?”
The Free French Forces did liberate Paris, after (American biased view follows in italics): hitching a ride on American and British boats (the US, UK, and Canadian forces that captured the beachhead were done with them), and marching behind Patton’s 3rd Army to the outskirts of Paris. In order to set de Gaulle up as a hero, Eisenhower left the liberation of Paris to him. This set de Gaulle up to be a minor thorn in the side of the US later (not the first nor last time someone the US backed in one conflict caused us trouble later- Saddam & bin Laden come to mind- not that de Gaulle was the same sort of trouble, he rose up to be a mostly friendly rival, not an enemy). We also didn’t have any trouble cooperating with communists (does Stalin ring a bell?). The defeat of the Germans was a team effort. It maybe could have been doable (with a lot more Allied casualties) without the French (that’s a big “maybe” and a big “a lot more”), but not without the US (and it’s muscle), the UK (manpower and convenient base), or the Soviets (lots of manpower on a [strike]2nd[/strike] 1st front).
On another hand, we have the Italian-Americans (stereotype: mobster, and all that goes along with that). The New York State Commission for Social Justice (CSJ), Order Sons of Italy in America (OSIA) (new stereotype- can’t come up with a snappy name or acronym) has this little page with whines about “bias and bigotry against Italians, Italian-Americans and other ethnic, racial or religious groups” (Funny, they only include stuff about Italians and Italian-Americans; nothing is there about “other ethnic, racial, or religious groups”). Targets include The Sopranos (understandable, to a slight degree), and other mob-related stuff, from commercials to extremely minor characters in The Simpsons.
On yet another hand, we have Indians/ Hindus (stereotype: worship deities posessing more than two hands). That’s a joke… I’ll stop with the first two hands.
The two sites above seem to think their group is being unfairly singled out:
and
and,
One doesn’t have to look past the Simpsons to see that just about every ox is gored: the Scots (Groundskeeper Willie), Indian Indians (Apu), American Indians (had to stretch for this one- everyone at the Indian casino “Caesar’s Pow-Wow”, including the entertainment “Carrot Scalp”), French (“cheese eating surrender monkeys”, Jacques the bowling instructor), Irish-Americans (Mayor Quimby), or even plain old Americans (just about every citizen of the All-American Everytown of Springfield, from Bart the juvenile delinquent, to Homer the lazy, drunken lout, to Barney the lazier, drunker lout, to Mr. Burns the scheming plutocrat, etc.). Sometimes, the “anti-defamation” activists are the target of ridicule and/or depictions of hypocrisy (in The Sopranos, the Italian-American anti-defamation activist ex-husband of Dr. Melfi, who complains of the violent vigilantee stereotypes perpetuated by her mobster patient is driven to want to perform his own violent vigilanteeism, after his ex-wife is raped and the prosecution bungled by the cops).
Up for discussion: [ul][]Is it racist (or any other “ist”) or hateful to use these sorts of stereotypes for humor and/or other entertainment? []Are people who chuckle at the use of these stereotypes just as bad?[]Are the people who complain about the use of these stereotypes oversensitive, humorless twits? []Is it possible to use these stereotypes and still think that every human is a distinct individual, worthy of respect and admiration based on their own behavior and qualities?Can one’s use of the stereotypes in a satirical way be used to poke fun at the stereotypes themselves, and those who take the stereotypes seriously (i.e., racists, anti-semites, etc.)?[/ul]Discuss.