A troll posted this demotivational poster on a website I frequent.
Basically the troll is arguing that Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores is blaming the Baltimore riots on gay MARRIAGE, which is not true.
Here is her poster:
http://www.politifake.org/derp-baltimore-riots-homophobia-bill-flores-politics-62717.html
Again, she claims that Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores is blaming the Baltimore riots on gay MARRIAGE when it is obvious he is not doing that.
If there’s not more to that quote than was supplied, then I would likely say it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities, with some baiting thrown in.
And I found evidence of my position…
Looks like I was right, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/30/bill-flores-gop-lawmaker-ties-baltimore-riots-to-g/ 
But the troll that is arguing with me still persists in her claim that Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores is blaming the Baltimore riots on gay MARRIAGE.
Basically the troll does not understand basic argumentative techniques.
It is clear that this is a case of “contextomy” and the politician is being taken out of context to make him look bad.
Clearly the Texas Republican is saying that gay marriage would make the riots worse, rather than blaming the riots on gay marriage. Thus he is baiting his followers with some red meat, rather than doing what she claims - that the Politicians is blaming the Baltimore riots on gay marriage.
Just wanted to a consensus of debaters to show her (the troll) what I already know - that I won this debate hands down.