No, but neither is this going to be a Rocksteady beat. WB Montreal will be taking over on the franchise… these guys apparently made the Armored edition (I think that’s the WiiU edition of Batman: Arkham City) and some scooby doo game. The main dev was also responsible for Protoype and the Incredible hulk…
I’m worried.
Anyway, the game will have Batman meeting his most dastardly adversaries for the first time and I wouldn’t be surprised if the game is more open world than even Arkham City.
Do we really need another origin story? One of the things I loved about the previous Arkham games is that they didn’t waste my time and went straight to Batman being Batman. A prequel also seems like a lazy way to have the Joker in the game. Talk about having your cake and eating it too.
I’ll have to admit I’m concerned at this point - concerned enough that I’ll rent this via Gamefly before I buy it, whereas I got B:AA and B:AC on day of release…I’m going to be especially looking for reviews about the combat system as compared to the RS games.
Well, it is Arkham Origins, not Batman Origins, so maybe Batman will still already be Batman.
It would have to be the origins of the Arkham prison asylum and not the Arkham itself, though, as we know about the origins of Arkham from the first game. Unless the guy was so insane he made up that history altogether.
And it takes place in Gotham (which imo the second game should have). So it’s not centered on Arkham as far as we know, and it isn’t an origin game. Pointless title. Has Arkham in it to tie it to the other two, has Origins in it as a generic game suffix title (as far as I can see).