I’m not saying there are none that reject… Hell we couldn’t have the enterataining nude fire bath panels without them.
What I am saying that is that there are very few* who reject outright without some sort of external influence actively decieving them. They rarely read the message and say, “Thanks but no thanks” And of course are never shown but as anything but ranting foaming nasties when they do say no.
Look at the majority of the Sinners Jack portrays (*please note this is the Chickoverse which has no correlation to the real universe so some weird statements are forthcoming)
Witches (fooled by the Devil)
Scientists (fooled by Evolution’s deliberate Lie)
Catholics (fooled by papa pope and mother church)
Muslims (Fooled by Islam which was created by the Catholics)
Mormons (another Catholic created religion)
Masons (fooled by the Devil)
Gays (Double whammy as they have been shown to not only pawns of the Gay agenda but have there own invisible deamons which convince them to not change)
Party Girls (Another Devil on the back)
Rock and Rollers (their agent was non other than Lucifer)
D&D players (Witches infuence)
Molester/child abusers (Direct demonic attcks)
You also have average folks under teh infuence of Witches, deamons and Catholic agents priests
*I concede that Older Tracts do have the folks who merely say no without an external pressure “Holy Joe” “this was your life” “Titanic” for example. But they existed in a early chickoverse where you never heard “Jesus who is that?”
As he aged Jack seems to have changed his view why his message isn’t selling.
I agree with your point on ignorence about Christianity, however I’m only discussing the bizarro World in which the phrase “Jesus who is that?” is common and the possible explanation for that.
Boy, does that take me back. Back in my college years I knew a priest who loved to rephrase Bible passages with modern flavor.
His take on the actual quote was simply: “But Lord, it’ll smell!”
Since what Jack has here isn’t in the original (and it’s kinda’ odd, now that I think about it, that a KJV-only purist would feel free to rephrase quotes for a tract) I’m wondering whether he believes that the Jews in the first century spoke in 1600’s Early Modern English, including words like “stinketh” or if he’s just showing off his sense of humor, and trying to make the tract more entertaining.
Here’s what first came to mind-- my mind, though:
“By now he stinketh, Master.”
“Well, now, you’re no rose yourself, Rose. – I mean Martha!”