NFL Predictions - Week 7 (Zygi Wilf and his four-letter words)

The word is out that we’re going to have a Jeff Garcia sighting for the Lions today, which throws that game into doubt, for me at least. Was definitely going to put it up as a ‘lock’ for the Browns, but I think it’s very possible now that the switch will give Detroit a boost, at least for the one week.

Through two weeks of picking five (throwing one’s self into the fire to give one’s self the right to comment, as it were), I’m sitting at 7-3. A quick perusal of this week’s games gives me:

Rams, Packers, Redskins, Colts, Falcons

Though I wasted probably the tastiest pick of the week (the Chiefs) by not getting it in 'till right under the deadline, of course.

Torry Holt was just declared out of the Rams/Saints game. In a weird way, I think that might make me even more sure of the pick, because it’ll make the Rams rely more on the RBs and less on the arm of one Jamie Martin; on the other hand, talk about an absolutely brutal hit in my fantasy leagues, which are generally anchored by a Holt/Steve Smith combo at the WR slot, and are now missing both (the top two WRs in a lot of formats) this week due to injury and bye. Ouch.

Edinger from 56 to give Mike Tice some inkling of hope that he won’t be fired in the immediate future…

Damn, it’s good. Favre goes crazy and they still lose, go figure.

Friday Night
20 **DOLPHINS…2…**30 **Chiefs…**50 **43…**Chiefs cover the points.
Early Games
28 **RAMS…3…**17 **Saints…**45 **47…**Saints in the upset. The over looks pretty good.
20 **Packers…1½.**23 **VIKINGS…**43 **44…**Packers, I guess.
38 **Colts…15…**20 **TEXANS…**58 **45…**Texans keep it close enough at home to cover. Over.
13 **BENGALS…1…**27 **Steelers.**40 **43…**Ben leads the Steelers back to contention. Over.
20 **EAGLES…4…**17 **Chargers.**37 **47½…**Chargers run wild on Philly, but it stays under.
10 **BROWNS…3…**13 **Lions…**23 **35…**Browns and the over. I like them both a lot.
52 **REDSKINS…12…**17 **49ers…**69 **37…**Twelve?! sigh Redskins and the under.
Late Games
13 **SEAHAWKS…3…**10 **Cowboys…**23 **46…**Cowboys keep it rolling and keep it under.
38 **RAIDERS…3…**17 **Bills…**55 **40…**Bills may or may not cover, but this game is over.
10 **BEARS…1…**6 **Ravens…**16 **31…**Bears suck a little less, IMO. Over.
20 **CARDS…3…**10 **Titans…**30 **46…**Titans get the road win. Under.
24 **GIANTS…1½.**23 **Broncos…**47 **47…**Giants. G-Men. Jints. Big Blue. Four wins! Under.
Monday Night
27 **FALCONS…7…**14 **Jets…**41 **40…**As much as it pains me, Falcons and the over.

Spread Picker Picks
5 Texans Loss
4 Cowboys (Push)
4 Rams WIN
4 Vikings WIN
3 Cards WIN
2 Broncos WIN
2 Dolphins Loss
2 Eagles Loss
2 49ers Loss
2 Jets Loss
2 Ravens Loss
1 Raiders WIN
1 Steelers WIN

Wow, the honeymoon is over for the spread picker, going 6-6-1 for the week, making this the first time it failed to post a winning percentage. I may have to resort to applying a best bets filter to it to see if it helps. Meanwhile, on Sunday I went 5-8 in the early games, 4-5-1 in the late games, and then pulled it out with a 2-0 on MNF, plus the 1-0 for Friday’s matchup makes that 12-13-1 for the week. Surely I have to win a bet somewhere in those 12 wins, right?

Early Games
Risk 55 for 50 on a tease: Texans getting 23, 49ers getting 20, and the Chargers getting 12

Damn 49ers, let up a nickel against Eli to give him his first road win, ya bastards! Like all teasers, this one lost by a single blowout. Of note is that the Indy game was a winner in all 3-team teases, regardless of which team you picked. Love those “tease lock” kind of games. In fact, 9 of the 14 games were tease locks this week. That means that if you were doing a 3-team tease, 23 of the 28 teams playing were winners. So naturally I picked one of the losing 5. Go me. Now down 55…

Late Games
Risk 55 for 50 on the Giants

Wow, a half point screwed me. Now down 110. Ouch.

Monday Night
Risk 30 for 60 on the Falcons & the Over

Yeah, great, the Jets are awful. The win of 60 helped defray the week, leaving me down 50 net. Not the worst, but I need to be chipping away at the hole I’m in, not digging it deeper.

[post=6696653]Standings[/post]
This week: 12-13-1, -50
Season: 53-67-1, -450
Spread Picker: 25-16-1

Against the Spread
5-1 Jags

5-2 Colts

4-2 Bears
4-2-1 Broncos
4-2-1 Chargers
4-2 Chiefs
4-2 Giants
4-2 Lions
4-2 Redskins
4-2-1 Seahawks
4-2 Steelers

4-3 Bengals
4-3 Falcons

3-3 Browns
3-3 Bucs
3-3 Packers
3-3 Panthers
3-3 Patriots
3-3 Raiders

3-4 Bills
3-4 Saints
3-4 Titans

2-4 Cards
2-4-1 Cowboys
2-4 Dolphins
2-4 Eagles
2-4 49ers
2-4 Ravens
2-4 Vikings

2-5 Jets
2-5 Rams

1-5 Texans

OK, let’s take a look at the progress made towards the new goal. I went 10-3-1 ATS, finally having a good week. Of course, a 5-8-1 mark vs the O/U gives reason for pause. I flaked out and forgot to post my pick 5 before the games were played, but I figure you all can trust me once again, they were Indy, Washington, Atlanta, Denver and KC. Though if you give this 5-0 week an asterisk I won’t hold it against you.

So, the new grand totals are:

47-52-2 (46.5%) ATS
33-34-1 on the O/U
20-25 on OMNI picks

Of course my math was hosed in the OP here, I actually needed to go 90-78 (before this weeks results) not 88-80. To hit that goal of .500 by week 10 I’ll need to average 9-5, and this weeks 10-3-1 mark certainly is a great first step bringing me from 12 games under .500 to just 5 games.