No offense Punha, but how do you know? Like I said, most of us have done silly, probably tasteless things while drunk or just feeling frisky. I’d hate to be judged by some of the things I’ve while in one of those states.
Do you hear me world?!?! I am more than what I do when legally over the limit and/or hormonally driven!
Gotta say, Lizard, I got a bad case of mental whiplash just seeing your thread title after reading through Homer’s “loving boobies” thread. All that enthusiastic male appreciation made me respect the front side of my torso a lot more than before.
But back to the OP…, yeah, those videos are blatant sleaze. Now I wanna be real careful and real clear here: doing something silly while under the influence (or not) doesn’t make a woman a sleaze. If anything, the sleaze are the camera-toters who haunt beach parties, Mardi Gras, etc. in the expectation of filming some amateur breast baring. Hell, just by waving a camera at happily intoxicated–by whatever–women maybe in some ways they’re prompting the behavior.
But in all fairness, drunk or not, carried away by joie de vivre, whatever, no woman who flashes her naked breasts in public when she sees a camera can be suprised or offended when she ends up in a sleaze video. Hey, there are usually some guys busily filming their own home movies, just cutting out the middle man. Those individuals often fall into the category of “jerk”. It’s one thing to share in an experience; it’s another to pull a grunting Beavis routine and make a stroke film for later.
Veb
sigh Those videos are just terrible. Call me old-fashioned, but whatever happened to “what happens in Spring Break stays in Spring Break”?
This is kind of what I’m getting at with my pissy attitude towards the women themselves. In the ad, some (actually most of them) of them seem to be showing off for the camera. I just want to scream hello?! What do they think is going to happen to that footage? To me it shows a certain lack of intelligence that a woman would do such a thing with a camera right there, and I guess that is the reason I percieve the looks on their faces to be so vapid.
As for the people who make the tapes, I pretty much agree with what everyone else has already said.
Yeah… I can kinda understand where ya’ll are coming from but… so what? Maybe they’re showing off for the cameras cause they’re having fun and don’t care. What’s wrong with not caring if people see your breasts? I don’t care if people see mine. If someone wants to sell video of my hard semi torn nipples for $20 a pop, go for it.
Beg to [url = “http://www.gay-free-pics.com/bozhemoi/clothed/shredded.jpg”]differ.
Combination of, as I see now, misreading the OP and a poor choice of words.
Hey, matt_mcl, that page didn’t work for me.
SMUT! My vote is for ‘Smut’
…such a cute word…
smut, smut, smut…
Imagine how these poor women feel… seeing their faces (and pther parts) on TV every fifteen minutes or so. I bet that wasn’t what they expected to be the end result. Think how ‘proud’ they must be. I get mad at the producers for not fuzzing out their faces, at least in the ads.
SMUT! Of course! Thank you Gravity! I can’t think why I didn’t think of that. Not only is it a great word, it’s one of my favorite songs.
Having seen the video in question (thanks to the same friend who buys the Jerry Springer videos), I have this to add to the mix:
They’re not precisely a case of guys with vidcams prowling around and waiting for a random flesh-flash. For the most part, the video consists of the filmer approaching the women on the street, camcorder in full view, and asking women to flash for beads. In other words, the women are specifically flashing the guy with the camera, not just letting it hang out in general, so they know damn well that they’re being filmed. Does that change y’all’s analyses any?
Yeah. Now I know that there really is a form of life on this planet dumber than pond scum.
