From the fingers of a miscreant who has never discharged a firearm.
My previous response to you remains well supported. Bravo!
While I admit that I have shunned shoot-em-up games, from Castle Wolfenstein to Call Of Duty, and I fully concede that you are probably my superior when it comes to winning great battles using “God Mode”, I grew up in Northern Idaho and was handling a Remington .30-06 rather well by the time I was 12. I’ve handled a pistol or two, and had a bit of training in the military with a standard M-16.
Could you “be” more flippant?
Time for Gyro to kick one in now.
You fools are only demonstrating how “not” seriously you take this issue.
Nice job, keep up the good work!
You bore me.
Buh bye.
I’m sure you are bored as well as boring.
Go on and play with your dope friends in some other threads now little boy.
So just to recap: There is a good possibility that an armed response from a responsible theater goer could have delayed, deterred or even stopped Holmes resulting in a better outcome in the Aurora shooting. Also, there is a statistically insignificant possibility that simply “taking your chances with the psychopath” would result in anything different than what actually happened.
Logic. What a bitch, huh?
Nope. Never happen. You’re an idiot.
Apparently “Kwimby” is trolling at least one gun forum, where he’s openly called a troll, a sock puppet, etc. Same big talking behavior over there too.
You know, “Kwimby” is listed as a variant spelling of Quimby in the Urban Dictionary, which is defined as “To make a fool of oneself unintentionally”.
And really Kwimby, you got nothing. Full of noise and fury, signifying nothing.
You’re managing to bore us, that much is true.
As has been noted over and over, no, there isn’t. You’d have two people shooting in a crowded theater. Or three. Or eight. There would be no possible way to tell the “good” shooters from the “bad” shooters. They would have no way to know not to target each other. The scenario simply deteriorates into violent chaos.
Possibly so. That’s why we say, we’ll take our chances with the psychopath. As bad as it was, what you are imagining would be worse.
Let us know when you learn some.
Good luck with that.
Since my odds of being shot in one of these kinds of massacres is much much less than my odds of winning the lottery, ‘good luck with that’ is quite suitable with me, thank you.
Yeah, it’s kinda like the grain of sand on a beach thing.
I like the black sand beaches.
Thank you.
You’re a fucking idiot. BTW, I’m a logician.
It does follow logically from his posts.
He’s all a kwim and aquiver.
Don’t be discouraged, people. As long as You keep Kwimby here, he’s not out in the streets.
Nowadays with smart phones, that’s not necessarily true. He could be out there posting while driving or swearing at random strangers after he walks into them while posting.
So then in this context, that makes you my bitch!
Nice, forged statistics to back up Your point.
Do You realize that the percentage of blacks in Europe is quite low and that the poor and uneducated people in slums here are white too.
But to make things easier, let’s just drop away all the cases where criminals are killing criminals ( 'cause most of Us don’t do slumming, I think ). And let’s concentrate on cases where some psycho starts shooting a random crowd ( 'cause We’ve all been in a public place ).
Do You really think that Europe is just as bad as U.S. - or even worse?
No, I can shoot better than you too.