So would I.
I would especially like as much as is available on their reasons for believing that Saddam didn’t have any WMD. I hear a lot of accusations that Bush “lied” about Iraq’s having WMD. I have never seen any indication that anyone knew, or should have known, that Saddam had really destroyed them. And therefore, as far as I can tell, the worst that can be said about Bush is that he was wrong. So was practically everyone else on earth.
I have read a lot from people who opposed the war, but all of them seem to share the assumption that Iraq had WMD, and that we just needed to let the inspections continue and that would cause Saddam to destroy what he was assumed to have.
FWIW, I think Saddam destroyed his WMD sometime after the Gulf War. He didn’t want to admit it, as he wanted to
a) maintain a credible threat against invasion, either by the US or his neighbors,
b) keep the Kurds from rebelling again, and
c) not be seen as backing down to the UN.
He did hang on to his centrifuges, nuclear plans, and the mobile bio-labs, in hopes of stalling his way thru the inspections until he outlasted the will of the UN. Then the inspections end, he puts his centrifuges back online, and gets back to the task of developing his arsenal.
He was counting on the President being like Bush Sr., who was willing to drive him out of Kuwait, but not invade Baghdad and overthrow him, or Clinton, who was too busy with other things (ahem) to bother much about Iraq.
Unfortunately for Saddam, 9/11 went down, and suddenly the President of the moment was a lot more concerned with terrorism and terrorist regimes. And was not prepared to fool around indefinitely. Which is why Bush gave Saddam one chance to come completely clean, and Saddam did not.
I am sure that, sooner or later, some Democrat will claim he knew all along that Saddam didn’t have any WMD left. But it will be like Jeanne Dixon claiming that she predicted the JFK assassination - if she knew it, why can’t she produce any evidence that she said so before the fact? Same with the Snopes page of quotes - many of those cited are arguing that they are against military action in Iraq right now - but none of them are basing their opposition on an assertion that Saddam doesn’t have WMD. If they did, they would have been laughed off the public stage.
Because it is only the invasion of Iraq that let us know that (assuming we don’t find any more). Saddam was never going to admit it - if he had, he probably would not have been able to hold onto power.