I must confess that I’ve been educated by reading this thread. (rather unusual for a Pit thread, actually)
I’m not a gun owner, but I have had occasion to fire pistols and rifles owned by (and under the supervision of) my father, uncle, and roommate at various times over the past 15 years or so. Each time, the principles of gun safety were preached and practiced aggressively. I rather enjoyed the experiences, actually, and when I have some disposable income may get into target shooting myself. That’s really neither here nor there, though.
When I first read the OP, my first thought was “Who pissed in this guy’s Wheaties?” I found myself sympathizing with Candlemas’ future father-in-law’s evident shock that somebody would take such a hard-line stance.
I’m sure something similar has happened to most of us at one time or another: we ask somebody for a (seemingly minor and harmless) favor, and are shocked when the reply is a polite equivalent of “Hell, no!” Upon inquiring as to the reason for the refusal, we’re even more surprised to find that the reason involves not convenience or circumstance, but principle - this person is fundamentally opposed to what we’ve asked them to be complicit in.
Now, clearly, they’re well within their rights to refuse, for whatever reason. And, after confirming that they’re not joking around, I abide by their decision. Keeping such thoughts to myself, of course, I do walk away feeling that my values have just been judged and found wanting - which can sting.
Had my father-in-law asked me to keep a properly broken down, unloaded, and cased firearm in my apartment for a few hours, I would have happily complied, and thought nothing odd about it. So, after reading solely the OP of this thread, I concluded that Candlemas’ actions were justifiable (His house, his rules) but somewhat…assholish.
Having seen the replies from gun owners, though, I’ve reconsidered. I’ve found the flaw in the smug analysis I made to myself, and it was summed up quite perfectly by smoke: “A gun is NOT just another power tool.” I consider myself one who respects firearms, but I see that I haven’t thought about everything.
I guess what disturbs me most about my half-baked gun safety knowledge is that I saw nothing unusual (or unsafe) with FFIL’s request. It’s not like he was asking to leave a few bags of dope - there were no legal problems (that I’m aware of) with the request. (I am assuming that the weapon was unloaded and properly stowed. Were it ready to fire, my opinion would be dramatically different.)
There were, however, gun safety problems with the request, that I didn’t see. Clearly, I have more to learn before getting that .22 rifle for the range. Thanks, all.