Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell would have commented, but they were washing their hair while Hillary’s speech was on so they don’t really know what she said.
That rumbling you hear is 122 million Mexicans saying Oh, no you don’t!
There is always Russia or Crimea.
According to Trump, they’re the same country.
Recently I succumbed to a discount & purchased a Kindle Fire HD. The Kindle Paperwhite is better for straight reading & my laptop is better for surfing & replying but the Fire is quite an attractive media tool.
It came with the Washington Post app. Yes, there’s some uncomplimentary Trump coverage. But they published Jerry Falwell Jr’s Trump is the Churchillian Leader We Need.
So, the Post does present “the other side.” Of course Falwell Jr is utterly wrong. (And, although Churchill was the right man for the job at one stirring period, his long career was less than perfect…)
MIGHT not approve? How about DO not approve?
Seriously, give me the slightest scrap of evidence that suggest the Donald doesn’t approve of these human scum and their rhetoric. I dare you.
JFK, and no doubt many before, said that you should keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Since the WaPo has no access to Trump it has nothing to lose by letting him have it. Not a good move, Don the Con.
And a daily WaPo summary comes to the email address I use for Amazon, so it isn’t just the Kindle. I’ve been enjoying it.
I don’t think this thread is going the way Mr. Redneck expected it to.
Yeah, no. Running him out of the country implies running him into a different country.
What have ANY of them done to us to deserve that?
Russia, for invading Crimea, and interfering in the US election. Russia deserves him.
“…a world increasingly hostile to our values.”
Could it be because your values have become racist, misogynist, xenophobic, islamaphobic ?
Surely all the Gods ever created, are hostile to those values!
yeah it’s paranoid hyberbole. During the cold war a far larger number of people were “hostile to our values” and we survived without the extreme security theatre measures and xenophobia of today.
The coverage I’m talking about is in the news section. Of course the opinion section has different contributors. I don’t think the news section has gone an inch out of its way to present favorable coverage of Trump in the name of being “balanced.”
Just because a racist agrees with you doesn’t make you a racist.
The mud being slung by both sides is most disappointing, but par for the course.
Pandering to, and accepting the support of racists makes one an enabling douchebag.
Nope. The KKK and many other racist organizations claim to be “Christian” organizations. Hence, the god(s) they believe in do approve of those values.
When a product of ideation meets the definition of racism, it’s a material consequence that anyone expressing that view makes himself a racist.
It’s not mud slinging when someone asserts claims which are both coherent and sound.
The important thing to remember is that both sides do it. We mustn’t forget that, even if it were possible to forget that.
There are a lot more accusations of racist assertions and actions against Trump that association.
“than association”, not “that association”.
Trump: blahblah wall… blahblah Mexican judge… blahblah ban Muslims… blahblah…
Duke: we really like this guy! 
<3<3<3
Clinton: Trump is a racist!
Trump: am not! You are!
Duke: yes you is, yes you is! Who is a pwetty widdle racist! Twumpie is! Twuuuumpie is! We really like this guy! <3<3<3