Now THAT Was Fucking Helpful....

**

Little testy are we? From my point of view, never trust the sources someone gives. They can filter out 99% of the sources related to other things and present just the best, disproportional information. It’s even worse on the internet, most of these goddamn news stories are 4th hand and you should see some of the anti palestian propaganda sites I found. Generally, if I want to know something, I’ll research it myself. How the hell do I know the other person isn’t using cites that aren’t full of crap.

**
Anyone under the age of 18 taking part in military actions, is a child soldier. So a 17 year old throwing molitovs for the PLA could be considered a child soldier.
http://www.rb.se/childwardatabase/efaq.htm#one So if they are encouraging children over the age of 16, some must then be under the age of 18. So, by discouraging children under 16 are they encouraging children OVER the age of 16 to take part? Kinda hard to say isn’t it?

  1. It’s not an accusation, it’s a documented fact.
  2. You asked for cites about impropore use of children for military conflict. Oh no I included a wrong link. I obviously don’t know the difference.

Ok, so the last link doesn’t tell children to throw stones against tanks.

But it doesn’t say children shoulnd’t throw stones or petrol bombs at soldiers with guns, who in situations when they are outnumbered and are getting hit with stones, people are trying to set them on fire and sooner or later someone will start shooting. You’re going out of your way to put children in a situation where they are comming under GRAVE risk for their lives. They are attacking soldiers in often rapidly changing situations.

Anyway TwistofFate, calm way the fuck down.

There’s a reason why I don’t go into Great Debates. I don’t trust people when it comes to debating something they are passionate about, or something emotionally charged. People will distort facts and outright LIE to make their point and win converts. If you do more research into human right violations on both sides of the Isreal-Palestine conflict you’ll find more fucked up propaganda than you can point a stick at. Without GETTING OFF YOUR ASS and reading it all for yourself, and they trying to check the information contained in the first batch of sources how do you know you’re not quoting, or getting quoted utter BS from one side trying to influence your opinion?

It’s the dumbass parroting of things people hear that I take issue with. If people have an opinion it’s a goddamned certanty that they’ll have information to back it up. For christ’s sake. Look at the shitty quality of information I found.

Doesn’t that tell you something?! The best information was a second hand reading of a UN report, which probably was generated by an afteraction report.

The PA statement about discouraging children under 16 doesn’t directly say anything. It implies they willingly encourage children 16 and 17 to participate. But does that fall under the child soldier/child shield regulations? Without looking at EVER instances of children acting w/ the authorization of the PA you CAN’T MAKE THAT CALL! The whole situation is so FUCKED up over there, unless we’re going to go there and visit for a while it will be impossible to tell if there is any systamatic use of children either as combatents or as human shields.

About ALL that any of the information we gets about that conflict will tell us is that some children are getting killed. If there is an organized decision to use children as a buffer for armed adults when they confront the IDF we don’t know. The level of hate there is high enough that both children and adults will respond to the IDF. Is it a case of the palestinians unable to keep their children away from the conflict or are they sending them out?

It all comes down to how you interpret the facts.

Why ask for a cite when you can easilly tell there is no clear information on it.

Yes, sure there may be some instances of adults using children as a screening force. But how can you tell it’s policy for one of the groups in the area or if it’s a bunch of animals using children to take a bullet from them?

You’re asking for a cite on something both sides take all information that goes out and puts their own spin on it demonizing the other side.

I take issue with that.

Do you understand the difference?

Actually, under 16 is a child soldier.
from your first cite

the way I always understood it to work was this.

a claim is made, eviudence supplied, evidence examined and or counter cites supplied. lather, rinse repeat.

As you said, you don’t go into GD, but that is how I understand the process of debate to work.

According to you, if no evidence is supplied to back up a claim, the burden lies on the reader to prove it right or wrong?

Preferrably I’d like cites from independent sources. They do exist you know.

I thought Israel was one of the countries which had 18 as the legal limit for serving in the armed forces? So wouldn’t that take precidence? Local laws over international law?

Then again I could be wrong.

No according to me: asking for a cite annoys the living crap out of me.
As for independent sources… there are too few of them :frowning:

Which brings up another problem…

Untill I actually read the UN report on the rights of children I always assumed it was anyone under 18 was a child soldier. And considering when I looked it up earlier the first 6 sites all said 18… which I now know is a misquote.

15!? WTF is up with that.

A child who is 15 and 1 week old should not be allowed to be conscripted into an army!

Sometimes the UN really has it’s head up it’s ass.

Unless I misread the damn report.

CR, its not the UN. the UN see a child as being under the age of 18.

Several international treaties recognise the age of consent to make your own decision to fight at 15. so it is possible to be over 15, not be a “child soldier” and still be a child in the eyes of the UN.

Let’s be clear: When I said “nits make lice”, I meant that Palestinian terrorists were once Palestinian children.

If Mommy and Daddy Palestinian don’t want Junior to become a grease spot, stop the terrorist activity & stop making your own neighborhood a battlefield.

The Palestinians have never had a legitimate claim to the lands they occupy. I think Israel has shown tremendous restraint in not eliminating all Palestinians in the region.

BTW, it’s not child murder, it’s collateral damage.

People who think they can “kick ass” on the internet crack me up!

So you find yourself hilarious too? Its good to have something we can agree on.

You’re so witty and clever! Not anything like most internet nerds! Let me try your method of “message board intimidation”:

The doctor who delivered you should’ve turned you around, stuck your head right back into your mother’s ass, and sliced you open from stem to stern with a scalpel.

Hmmmm…I seem to be doing something wrong. With practice, maybe I can become as good as you. :rolleyes:

I don’t pretend that I’m causing someone to quiver in a corner by posting on a message board. Some dildo named Shodan wants to get her panties in a bunch because I detest the terrorists (and future terrorists) that she dearly loves? That’s too bad for her. Her flow must be extra chunky this month.

Fred Phelps is from Wichita as well, isn’t he?

Topeka. Sorry.

Clint in Wichita, the first rule on the Straight Dope Message Board is “Don’t be a jerk.” This applies even in the Pit. You’ve started off badly, and frankly I’m not inclined to give you much slack. Tone it down, or find another message board to play on.

Lynn
For the Straight Dope

Arrg, I’ve wasted too much of my day looking up this whole child soldier crap.

The human rights watch sights call people under 18 serving in combat child soldiers. I read a UN report about the decision to set 15 as the min age for children in combat… Which discussed the objections to countries who wanted it set at 18… They noted that australia went for 18 when their own laws allow for 17. Which naturally I can’t find again, because it was interesting reading.

Arrg whatever.

The PA discourages children under 16 from participating. Decide for yourself if you consider them child soldiers.
Hrrm we’re way off topic and I don’t care anymore I should go home before my coworkers get me sent to a hospital.

I used the term “nits make lice” in a discussion about Palestinian children, and “Shodan” started this thread. I’ve seen much worse than “nits make lice” on this message board. If what you can get away with is directly related to how many posts you have, I can deal with it. Just fill me in on the numbers.

Clint, a bit of friendly advice, you can hold, and express, pretty much any opinion you want to on the SDMB, as long as you are willing to back it up with reasoned debate.

One of the key things you can’t do, is go out of your way to piss off the mods, regardless of how many posts you have.

There’s a couple of other things you can’t do, like trolling and being a jerk. This qualifies as both.

**

Her flow must be extra chunky this month? Please. I know that this is pretty extreme but, well, there is only one conclusion that I can draw. You, sir, are a, a, . . . a turdburglar! :eek:

Think how Topeka must feel.

:rolleyes:

Not that it matters, Clint old sock, but I am a guy. Sorry if I am ruining any fantasies for you.

I suppose I should refrain from whipping you into a ban-worthy froth, and thus deprive us of your no doubt deeply insightful posts on a variety of world affairs, so if She Who Must Be Obeyed would lock this thread, I would be grateful.

Regards,
Shodan

On preview - Whoo hoo! My first accusation of being a member of the SDMB elite, who get special privileges!

Shodan,

You really fire up don’t you? As long as the Palestinians attach bombs to their children and use them for shields they are going to get killed period.
TS Wrote:

Is it really any worse than what Shodan wrote about him? i think not.
BIG DADDY

Trying to find a common ground.