Wolffy wrote:
Yea, that’s ususally the response from someone who seriously lacks any IQ. Good to see you have spent some serious time working on your name calling though that was pretty impressive stuff. <IMG SRC=" http://64.246.47.4/BB/images/smilies/rofl.gif";
This is what I meant but since you can’t edit your posts here. :rolleyes:
no, Sparky–YOU wrote that.
:rolleyes:
As someone whose first introduction to this B-Board was this thread, I have to say I’m not impressed with your apparent lack of even-handedness.
Quotes from Shodan like “tied down and sodomized with a dildo wrapped in razor wire” and “hung upside down and have jalapeno pepper sauce dripped on the paper cuts on your scrotum” go by without remark. Shodan goes on to call CfW names such as “imbecilic fuckwad” and “mouth-breathing moron,” and then a whole crowd jumps in to pat Shodan on the back much like little kids on the playground cheering on the bully. But as soon as the woefully outnumberd Clint in Witchita attempts to fight back with the similar extreme verbal weaponry, you step in and warn him? That is ridiculous, IMO.
What is the difference between that and the crap that Shodan is spewing? Just wondering?
No, but you can preview. But I suppose that’s only for those of us with low IQs (who know that if we complain about not being able to edit our own posts once, still won’t be able to edit them half an hour later).
My sentiments exactly. That torture thing at the top was as bad or worse tha anything else I read on here. I guess they did it cause the other guy was new or something.
Hey wolffy, all you have to do is engage in the debate instead or cowering like a little bitch.
patteeu, my own suspicion is that Clint’s advocacy of genocide is what’s over the limit of jerkitude, even for The Pit, not so much the verbal abuse.
BD, you’ve been told by UncleBeer, this isn’t the forum for debate…what I said had nothing to do with the points you made, and weren’t in any way related to the stance you took.
It was a personal attack, because *the way you made those points, *you came across as being a hateful, racist, genocidal, warmongering little prat. capisce?
[sub]God, I love the pit![/sub]
Yawn. Hackneyed, contrived, non relevant rhetoric, anyone?
Let me try the following. No-one here has argued against the use of force. Indeed should you approach your subject and strike him, and he should then deck the living hell out of you, I’m sure many people would view this as a good thing and be happy.
To give a slightly more relevant case, let us imagine that you murder someone. Should I then have you and 9 members of your family executed as just punishment? Can you see, for 1 second, any slight problems with this scheme?
I dunno, what makes you think I’ve read what Shodan “spewed?” I was just trying to make a point of clarification based on my years of moderating experience here. It’s entirely possible that I’m mistaken and that bit I quoted is only part of what’s Lynn is talking about. If you want a more formal statement from Lynn as to what specifically irked her, I suggest bouncing off an e-mail to her. Her address is available through her profile.
Allow me to repeat myself. If you want a civil debate, try the forum designated for that. Coming in here whining about the level of discourse is misguided.
Wolffy wrote:
Wow! I’m going to have to pull my socks up to keep up with you Big Daddy!
**
**
I can only draw one of two possible conclusions here, either you’re serious or you’re not – and neither of these conclusions reflect particularly well on you.
I didn’t read the original thread so I don’t know what CiW said besides the “nits make lice” quote. But that plus his clarification:
hardly constitute a call for genocide IMO.
patteeu <-- thinks that genocide is a word that gets thrown around too lightly
UncleBeer,
I got you the first time. Are you inferring that there can be no logical conversations in the BBQ pit? Why don’t you call it the name calling thread if that is all that is allowed here.
Gary wrote:
To give a slightly more relevant case, let us imagine that you murder someone. Should I then have you and 9 members of your family executed as just punishment? Can you see, for 1 second, any slight problems with this scheme?
In the case of an isolated incident, yes. In the case of having your kids and civilians attacked by organized militant groups, no. Once the general population gets tired of paying the price for what these barbaric morons are doing they will start telling you where they are at and what they are doing. It’s not a nice thing but a necessary thing.
<sigh> OK, if it’ll shut you up (which I doubt)…
That goes a bit beyond “striking back.” It’s that kind of attitude which made Bin Laden hate us in the first place [sub]debatably[/sub]. It’s what they call “Yankee Imperialism.”
Yes, we’re a country of many races, as well as religious tolerance, apparently.
<sniff, sniff> Yup. Smells genocidal to me.
Well, you stumped me–I used “Warmonger” as an insult, you look at it as a point of pride. One man’s meat is another man’s poison, I suppose.
Now go away. I’m done with you.
TS wrote:
I can only draw one of two possible conclusions here, either you’re serious or you’re not – and neither of these conclusions reflect particularly well on you.
Why not, turn into the new age Babylon of the Middle East. The little Muslim Hotties will make more in a night than they would have made in a lifetime and everyone will have a good time. You like girls don’t you TS?
BIG DADDY
IF they can do it in Vegas we can do it there!!!
The original context of “nits make lice” - in GQ - was a call for genocide against American Indians, as explained previously in this thread. Clint obviously intended the genocidal connotations, as his clarification does in fact make clear: One can get rid of the terrorist problem by killing Palestinian children before they have a chance to become terrorisits. And given the context, what are we to make of the comment about “eliminating all Palestinians in the region,” other that jolly Clint is suggesting that Israel would be justified in killing all Palestinians. (Somehow, I don’t think he was talking about simply deporting them.)
Wolfy,
I’m just fighting fire with fire. He wants all our women to wear Burkas or he’s going to attack us forever. Well hell that’s easy, eliminate the Burkas, you can always bring them back after you wack the wackos.
Wolfy, that’s not genocide
geno·cidal (-sdl) adj.
geno·cidal·ly adv.
I do not want to eliminate an entire race, political or ethinic group. I just said we must smite them 10x
As far as the taking over of the country goes they can always have it back after they have some system plugged in where the people have a say in what happens in their country and the wackos are wacked.
