There are certain benefits for having a gun in school namely incapacitating someone shooting students but in my opinion the risks outweigh this benefit. Putting the gun in a lock box reduces the benefit by making it harder to get to the gun in the time of crisis. My point was that the risks of teachers carrying outweighed the benefits.
On further reflection I don’t have a problem with a gun in a locked safe in a principals office but I don’t really see the benefit.
Armed teachers have stopped school shootings in this country. As a teacher, I support guns on campus in qualified hands. That counts out almost every teacher I know. But there should be some available, on-site option if the shit hits the fan and some nutjob starts taking out students. I know some of my administrators are ex-military. I know there is at least one counsellor with a concealed-carry permit.
I don’t want to carry in my classroom, but I would like a closer response than the Sheriffs Office 5 miles away.
[snarky response]What a great idea! The best way to reduce the damage done by guns in schools is to increase the number of guns in the schools.[/snarky response]
Is this the NRA’s solution to every problem? More guns?
Shootings in schools? Have we tried giving guns to the teachers?
Concerned about somebody shooting you or a loved one? How many guns do you want?
Toilet clogged? Have you tried shooting it?
I’m no expert in this sort of thing (really I’m not ), but it sounds to me like somebody has a fetish.
Don’t have a cite handy, but I believe a principal or some such grabbed a gun out of his truck and disarmed a kid in a Mississippi school shooting some years back. (Could be wrong on the state)
I don’t think any of us that believe in the right to own guns are advocating having teachers running around packing heat.
As was mentioned above, especially given the climate in schools today, I do believe some teachers/administrators should have access to firearms, given proper training of course.
As an aside, WTF is up with this shit!!? Hell, when I was in HS in the early/mid 70’s, during hunting season, we would carry our guns in the truck, so we could go maybe pop some squirrels after school.
I even remember the track coach admiring my old Mossberg pump gun out in the parking lot. Damn shame it has come to this.
We really don’t have enough information yet to make any sort of a safe judgement on this. I’m sure we’ve all known asshole teachers. How would we feel about asshole teachers with guns? No matter how the situation is handled, someone unsavory is likely to get one. What happens then?
I guess what I’m concerned about is that we would be asking an entire profession that has nothing to do with law enforcement/security to be a poorly trained security force. Unless boot camp is going to become de rigeur for the educational set, this is a lousy idea.
Hell, in my school kids would bring their rifles to school during hunting season. In eighth grade someone gave a speech on making shotgun shells, with a demonstration. Can’t imagine what would happen if he tried that now.
Hey, I’ve got an idea! Let’s put collars onto every student- lockable collars that they can’t remove. Now put a small explosive charge in there- so that, upon receiving a coded signal, it blows up. The charge is small enough that it only decapitates the kid, without harming anyone around him. You may’ve seen this used in a few movies.
This would be a lot more effective than guns, which conceivably could be wrestled away from the teacher, and require training to be used correctly. If a student threatens the life of another student or a teacher, someone in the office presses a button and blows the youngster’s head clean the fuck off! Problem solved, and casualties are reduced to the absolute minimum. Guns can be so inaccurate- but the explosive collar is a surgical strike.
And just imagine how effective this would be as a deterrent! I know that I wouldn’t think of storming the school with a shotgun, knowing that, at any moment, the principle could press The Button and I’d be painting the cafeteria arterial red! Just think how polite all the students would be. No more disrespect for authority, by gum!
Sure, it’d be a bit expensive to do this, but we’ve got the technology, and really- is any price too high to pay for the safety of our schools?
I heard that too. He couldn’t have a gun on campus, so his car was parked about a half-mile away.
I’d also heard that some students disarmed a kid who was shooting up a cafeteria. How? Because the kids knew enough about guns to tell from the sound the gun was making that the shooter had run out of ammo.
If the School Resource Officer had been armed maybe none of this would have happened. It’s no different than having armed air marshals on planes. Having teachers who have been given a gun safety training course, then arming them? I have no problem with that.
I am not so sure that this is the same thing. It is odd that people are asking for elaboration on this subject when just a week ago, a suspect took a gun from a trained law enforcement officer in a courthouse, killed multiple subjects and fled the scene. Cite
When my husband had to go through weapons training, he had to be sprayed in the face with mace and then wrestle with an individual for 3 minutes who was trying to get his firearm. This was designed because, in the field, there was the possibility that you could try and use mace, some would effect you and then a subject would come after you and try and get your weapon.
It is an EXTREMELY valid concern. The placing of weapons in schools, in the hands of non-professionals, where you have emotionally distraught children who can be put in explosive situations is a bad idea… in the extreme.
Paying for trained police officers, now let’s make that argument in another thread, but comparing the likelihood of a weapon being taken from an individual and used against them to a meteor hitting a school is way off the mark.
My father carried a .22 rifle to school every day when he was a child… leaned it in the corner by the door while class was in session.
Today, though, it’s probably a bad idea to have guns in the classroom. Maybe one in the Principal’s office might not be a bad idea, just in case corporal punishment wasn’t sufficient (you’d probably only have to make one example to get the rest of the kids to straighten up and fly right!)
I think were forgetting how quickly these things happen too. When a kid like the one in Red Lake wants to go on a killing spree and then kill himself, it happens in minutes and often the murderer has already killed himself. Getting a teacher, a guard, or a “response team” would likely do no good in these situations unless there was a hostage situation going on. And if that were the case, the police would likely be on there way anyway. I say arm the schools with a gas solution that when activated, sets off an alarm and knocks everyone out quickly (and safely). (likelihood of something like this?)
Interesting idea, if practical… but don’t forget when they tried to knock out the terrorists in Moscow and killed a bunch of the hostages. It wouldn’t be good to wipe out half the students with gas.
Yea crazy purple knockout gas doesn’t work like it does in the movies. The gas needed to incapacitate Bruno the 250 pound Offensive tackle will most likely kill Lisa the 90 pound cheerleader.
Or…stay with me here…we could actually budget the school system with enough money to hire enough competent,* trained* counselling staff who can recognize problems before they happen and help kids before they go postal.
Or we could try to figure out just what the hell is wrong with our society that is causing these sorts of things to happen these days, and try to fix that.