Yeah. I want to read the actual article rather than the abstract. Just been too busy the last week. I can’t draw enough information from the sentence “…all the parameters found in prostate plasma…” Probably this weekend.
This is true for the vast majority of porn squirting videos, however there are home videos of normal intercourse that show female ejaculation quite clearly and convincingly, and it has a great deal of pressure behind it, though it is a short burst. A squirt, you might say.
Google “Red Tube how to give women squirting orgasms” (er… NSFW in case you were wondering). If that’s fake it’s pretty damn good CGI.
I know this kind of fell off the map and I have been extraordinarily busy myself with personal and financial matters.
But I would be very interested to hear your take. I should reiterate that the study in question concerned two subjects. I recognize that that is an issue, but it is nonetheless scientific evidence and it involves a scientific examination of female ejaculate.
It is not proof that all female ejaculate is not urine, but it speaks to those who challenge the idea that it couldn’t be anything else.
For my part, I too can’t understand why this is in doubt.
I’ll be in my bunk.
I saw this subject in another thread with a link to this thread and I can
testify that this a true fact that women do in fact have ejaculation with
a steady flow of clear fluid that is not urine.
My test subject was a young 18 year old willing female with a nice, uh
well you know a nice clean one, with a nice white space around her pelvis on her very tan body that the swimn suit had hung on when we met.
If my face had not been where it was the stream she shot would’ve gone across the room, actually it was a travel agency office, after hours on the counch.
That stuff is real and it is not urine … I know the difference, plus I was shocked and she was shocked being her first time doing it in that fashion.
For an hour or so … “I was the da man”
Also must add that this event happened in the summer of 1980
Now I see from this thread that it is actually normal just not that common.
Great! Now we got squirting zombies!
-
Some threads I remember…
-
Who “provoked” is what I want to know.
-
J Sex Med. 2014 Dec 24. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12799. [Epub ahead of print]
Nature and Origin of “Squirting” in Female Sexuality.
Salama S(1), Boitrelle F, Gauquelin A, Malagrida L, Thiounn N, Desvaux P.
Author information:
(1)Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hopital Privé de Parly 2, Le Chesnay, France; AIUS (Association Inter disciplinaire post Universitaire de Sexologie), Pérols, France.
INTRODUCTION: During sexual stimulation, some women report the discharge of a noticeable amount of fluid from the urethra, a phenomenon also called “squirting.” To date, both the nature and the origin of squirting remain controversial. In this investigation, we not only analyzed the biochemical nature of the emitted fluid, but also explored the presence of any pelvic liquid collection that could result from sexual arousal and explain a massive fluid emission.
METHODS: Seven women, without gynecologic abnormalities and who reported recurrent and massive fluid emission during sexual stimulation, underwent provoked sexual arousal. […]Urea, creatinine, uric acid, and prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations were assessed in urinary samples before sexual stimulation (BSU) and after squirting (ASU), and squirting sample itself (S).
RESULTS: In all participants, US1 confirmed thorough bladder emptiness. After a variable time of sexual excitation, US2 (just before squirting) showed noticeable bladder filling, and US3 (just after squirting) demonstrated that the bladder had been emptied again. Biochemical analysis of BSU, S, and ASU showed comparable urea, creatinine, and uric acid concentrations in all participants. Yet, whereas PSA was not detected in BSU in six out of seven participants, this antigen was present in S and ASU in five out of seven participants.
CONCLUSIONS: The present data based on ultrasonographic bladder monitoring and biochemical analyses indicate that squirting is essentially the involuntary emission of urine during sexual activity, although a marginal contribution of prostatic secretions to the emitted fluid often exists.
Exactly what I would have expected once scientific studies were done.
Just shows how wrong people’s experiences/perceptions can be.
Where else but in SD GQ would you not only get a question, a sensible discussion with anecdotal evidence, followed by a conclusive scientific answer?