Obama/McCain/ SDMB Election/Hazle Weatherfield/Mod Request

That was not the point.You told me “to get over it” when I clearly stated I already did.

To get back to your point, since when is stating a poster should be banned or suspended junior modding? Its happened a thousand times without flaming. Since when is reporting a bad post (justified or not) junior modding ?

Had I addressed Hazle directly in any of the three threads like mods do to coerce a change in her behaviour then you might have a case. But that never happened. I merely made a request to mods.

I saw. It was a douchebag thing to say in the first place.

Instead of arguing the details of what junior modding means I’ll reiterate my point: whining that a poster should be suspended because you don’t like how they posted to your thread is idiotic.

And equally as dougebag as pointing it out after that person acknowledged it.

Clearly you did not see/read it before you made your first post. Just doesn’t make sense to make a request for something that 's in the bag. Either you are an idiot or just plain uninformed. I can’t respect anyone who doesn’t own up.

Well that’s your opinion. Why didn’t you say that in the first place?

If you say so. Whether he retracted it or not, he said it, which was moronic. He suggested we suspend Hazle because Hazle posted something he didn’t like. I’m not sure why somebody’s thought process would go there in the first place.

I did, but I congratulate you on developing psychic powers.

I thought your apology was insincere, and apparently it wasn’t. So I’ll give you credit for getting it right the second time.

What/where are these VOTE OBAMA and VOTE MCCAIN threads of which you speak?

Your thread title with its Delphic construction drew me in, which is why I opened this. So please spare me five minutes of searching for those threads.

Hahahaha, I’m not even into politics and knew that. :slight_smile: But that did make me laugh so good on you (not that making me laugh is the end all thing that everyone strives to accoplimish).

What does this even mean?

It reminds me of Biblo’s birthday speech.

Well then, I’ll leave it at that.

You mean that those threads aren’t scientific? I thought RCP and 538 were already factoring them into their averages.

IMHO

Well, they already nominated the president and VP, but I’m sure there’s plenty of room for more 'tards in their organization.

How does one ACCIDENTLY post? :rolleyes:

Thank you.

For once, I’ll agree with you. I’ve seen posts in both threads that I wanted to respond to, yet I somehow restrained myself.

But, TFD’s solution was not good, as it throws off the percentages, and I can totally understand why Czarcasm doesn’t want to babysit it. Just deal with the total dipsticks – they’re everywhere.

Suddenly, I feel like posting a couple of dozen times to both threads, just to see what TFD will do then.

Try to guess what I’ll do if you attempt this.

Y’know, if we had the ability to have actual polls on this message board, as the software allows for, this issue would never have arisen.

The Flying Dutchman could have started a true poll, where both sides were in the same thread, comments and all, responses and all, but nobody would count as a double vote.

ETA: not directed at you, Czarcasm, your post wasn’t there when I started typing.

But where are you going to get that many sets of jumper cables?