Obscure Methods

Perhaps some of you are familiar with Brian Eno’s “Oblique Strategies” cards, which he and cohorts developed as a way of getting past obstacles, creative blocks, etc. in the studio.

They have since become legendary cult items, ripe for exploiting. Besides, they’re a little too “oblique” for me.

Consequently, I present you with “Obscure Methods,” an alternative deck of virtual oracular wisdom-dealing thingies. It is a customary deck of 52 cards.

Think on your question; meditate, contemplate, obfuscate. You can coruscate or masticate too if you think it’ll help. Then pick a number between 1 and 52 to draw your virtual card. Go!

After much obfuscation, I choose 9.

Card #9: No fear, no worries.

(sorry for the delay. I fell out early last night.)

17, please.

29, please.

Card 17: Torque is stronger than friction.

Card 29: Bite the hand that feeds.

I think these cards are even more obscure and less helpful than the originals. I didn’t think it was possible!

No offense. :slight_smile:

Can I have number 2 please?

Card #2: Fold, spindle, and mutilate.

(Oh, sure, they’re obscure. But they’re not oblique.:))

Give me the joker. :slight_smile:

(Or failing that 31.)

Just Some Guy: But you see, I’m the joker. (Also the smoker. The midnight toker, however, is somebody else.)

Card 31: No user-serviceable parts.
Remember to take these metaphorically, and apply them in a larger sense. For instance, “no user-serviceable parts” is a sign we all see on electronic devices, telling us that there is nothing that we ourselves can do to mend it; and many of us know this to be patently false.

#23 please. Yes, I know it is a common choice, but I love a good prime.

Card #23: Try, try again.

Gracias por la brujería,** brujaja**.

How about lucky number 4?

So then I guess the card that tells you the ranks of poker hands is right out… :wink:

Card number 4: Non-marking-out soles.
{Took me years to figure that one out.}

I must go for #42.

Card #42: Change the writing on the wall.

#69

[Bill and Ted] “Sixty-nine, dude!” [/Bill and Ted]
Well, it’s a standard deck of 52. So, if you weren’t joking, I could reduce the number “69” for you through simple numerology, or Gematria, or something.

Or you could just pick a number at or below 52. :wink: