Asking random strangers about sexual topics reminds me of the time when I asked such a question on a question-and-answer website. A member, who self-identified on his profile as an applied mathematician, contributed a response. My question was about penile fracture for a sexually aroused man with an erect penis while wearing clothes. At the time, my secret hypothesis was that men would feel discomfort in their penises when sexually aroused, because it would be trapped within the clothes. Hence “boners” would be considered uncomfortable or embarrassing, and some men could not tolerate the pain so they would relieve themselves by taking off their clothes. If a woman or some other sexual stimulus were nearby, then the bare penis would be stimulated further to achieve orgasm. Hence the existence of sex in public. Anyway, the answerer merely replied that a penile fracture was unlikely when the penis would be wrapped in clothes, and discomfort was subjective. Then, he added that if I were a man, I should do some original research. If I were not a man, then find one that would be a willing participant. Considering the impossibility of finding such a man and embarrassing myself by asking a sexual question, along with the possibility of being insincere about my request, I’d rather not take the chance. I’ll just let my curiosity be tossed in the trash.
Whoever said that the confusion was nested fractally was on to something. I didn’t even know it was possible to have so many misconceptions about a topic.
I think you better tell us what state you live in. Joking about prostitution might be illegal.
It’s very hard to resist armchair psychology, but it seems like you carry around a lot of self-loathing, which gets transferred into a resentment towards others.
I don’t like alcohol either and I don’t like bars either and I am also very shy in social situations. But I would start to think something was wrong if I said things like “I’ll just let my curiosity be tossed in the trash.”
It seems that you’re really bothered and/or offended when people suggest that you consider getting some personal, “hands-on” experience. You don’t have to take this advice, but it shouldn’t bother or offend you – it’s a reasonable suggestion. If I want to learn about tennis, it’s reasonable for someone to suggest that I watch an actual tennis match (or a video of a tennis match) or even go to a tennis court and learn to play. I know sex is different than tennis, and the decision to watch or play is not quite as simple, but it really is a reasonable suggestion about how to learn. Again, you don’t have to take the advice, but it shouldn’t bother or offend you.
Not even slightly true. I challenge you to find a bar that will not serve you a shirley temple or other non-alcoholic (“virgin”) beverage, or even just a glass of water. If you are in the company of good friends, hanging out with them in a bar can be an enjoyable experience, and good friends will not pressure you to drink or judge you harshly for sticking to non-alcoholic beverages.
Also, some bars have halfway decent food.
I think you might want to offer some simple, easy-to-comprehend description of what you mean by this term “good friends.”
Are we predicting what **Umbridge **will be confused about next? Cool, 'cause I’m already working on “food” and “tennis”.
It all depends on context. Asking a random stranger about something kind of trivial and private may seem kind of creepy and insincere. I’ll just take that answerer’s word for it. The thought is really not that important. Even if I were being sincere of my inquiry, I would probably attempt to ask a more science-oriented guy to ask another guy about carrying it out, or evaluate the ethical implications before asking him to survey other men about their experiences.
Well…
…try not to order milk ;).
People who are lactose intolerant are probably not going to order milk, unless the milk has the lactase culture.
Bored now.
[QUOTE=Totally NOT someone whose username is based on a character from Harry Potter]
Many home builders use boards when building a house; unless the construction site is in a region where lumber is difficult to obtain. Then they will probably rely on an alternative building material.
[/QUOTE]
Gah!
Certainly not for your coffee
Yeah, I think we’re done here.
If we’re talking cats here, you forgot posting on YouTube.
But if we’re talking barbs, then we’re talking harpoons and whales - in other words Moby Dick.
Speaking of two of those things, my old neutered dog knew how to do pelvic thrusting when he humped his bed. He also could smell a pheromone from across the house. He knew when we were going to have sex before we did.
He didn’t do much for homelessness though.
And you could of stopped right here by observing that men seldom take off their clothes in public. And not so seldom get erections. Though only when we think about sex which is about five times a minute.
If you are worried about being able to move in the missionary position, I’d recommend that you don’t date men who weigh 500 pounds. If you do, I’ll agree it could be a problem.
Finally, I have two kids, both planned, and can testify that sex for procreation is the same as sex for fun. Except you should probably cut down on the oral.
Really? Every 12 seconds? You prude.