I can’t even begin to understand this. The amount of crazy here is just too much to believe. The Simpson book not only has him explaining how he did the murders in exacting detail that matches and fleshes out the police evidence in nearly every way, but also includes his motives (basically it’s all her fault for driving him to it and the fucking DOG set it off by WAGGING HIS TAIL at Goldman), but also has a second man there with him: a man who may well be described as something of accomplice in the murders… and THEN has him declaring himself to be 100% innocent and the account to be completely fictional.
What? Hunh? Buh?
Can anyone explain any of this to me?
Though, if there IS a second man out there who was with OJ during the night of the killings and then helped him dispose of the evidence, that’d certainly be interesting. Could this man be found and sent to prison where OJ got off?
And what the heck must the jurors think about all this today?
I am all but certain that he did it, but there is a small but nonzero possibility that someone else did it. It has been suggested with some plausibility that his son Jason did it and OJ took the hit. It is extremely unlikely that it went down that way, and there is absolutely no doubt that he had something to do with it, but one can make the case that he didn’t actually do the killings.
I personally think that if Fuhrman hadn’t perjured himself OJ would be looking at the needle, and for him to participate in something like this book is one of the most disgusting things I think I’ve ever seen, especially since he’s lucky he’s still alive right now.
That’s what I think, too. LA Law Enforcement: We Really Couldn’t Suck Much More.
I’m not sure what I’d have thought if I were on the jury. The amount of information they were allowed to get, compared with what thsoe of us scoring at home got, was miniscule. There’s a lot of stuff you’d have to stop knowing to put yourself in their shoes. I still think they got it wrong, though.
I’ve actually heard other people state that it would be okay to kill the slut/bitch/druggie Nicole, and if OJ did do it (which he didn’t) she deserved it.
IANAL, but if there was a second person involved, hasn’t OJ opened himself up to new charges of conspiracy to commit murder? Or does double jeopardy on the charge of committing the murder do away with any conspiracy to commit murder as well?
If folks would stop pissing blood everytime Orenthal trolled for attention, then maybe, just maybe, he’d go away and die penniless in a hovel somewhere. Every thread that is started about him only serves the media machine keeping food in his fridge.
This thread and others like it act as free advertising for him.
Well, you’re right, of course. I didn’t mean as heavy a criticism as it might have sounded. It’s too bad that the metaphysical nature of the thing is such that attempting to suppress attention does itself lend attention. Sorry for coming across as mean.
This has got to be the stupidest thing I’ve ever fucking heard. He brutally murdered two people, Nicole Simpson’s head was almost severed from her head, but because you believe he won’t kill again that means no harm, no foul?
Funniest post of the day!