OK, Beeyotches, You've Made Up My Mind For Me

[woodstockbirdybird]

@frankzafka

I would agree this is a minor bump in an otherwise stellar contributory effort here over the years. Give the guy a break.
On the other hand, we could always dive to the depths of screaming rants such as are your forte.

On the other other hand, we could dive further to contentless conservative-dick-sucking posts like yours. Or you could fuck off back to wherever you came from (Zenster, is that you?), which I imagine contains the words “Free” and “Republic” in some order.

[whole_bean]

Growing up in south Alabama, I knew a lot of mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging racists who reacted to Republican victories much the same way an Alabama Crimson Tide fan might react to an Iron Bowl win - juvenile taunts, silly [insert group here] jokes, etc. I have to wonder about the class of person who reacts to political victories the same way a chaw-stained hillbilly reacts to a football game.

[KarmaComa]

Bricker, I’ve come to admire you quite a lot over the years, in spite of my first (and admittedly ridiculous) instinct to lump you into the same pile as posters like the smug, spiteful and intellectually cadaverous Shodan. I’m honestly surprised by how much your OP disappoints me, and it actually makes me sad. Maybe it’s the greater fact that the McCain campaign has succeeded in lowering the tone of the election and reviving the disgusting divisiveness of the Bush campaigns. And I see the frothing liberals and understand where you’re coming from, but it makes me wonder:

Can’t you see that you are being had?

[Gangster_Octopus]

Vote for whomever you like for whatever reason you like. What do I care?

[ArizonaTeach]

@Starving_Artist

I resent the implication, Bricker.

He wasn’t slamming you; he was responding to the fact that your post was quoted in an attack on him.

Bricker, I wondered what your reaction would be to the last week of attacks by the Obama campaign, spokespeople, and supporters. I also wonder what would happen if John Mace ultimately changed his mind for whatever reason. The charges of, “I know you were never serious, you neocon asshole” would ring loud and clear.

[Chingon]

I for one am SHOCKED! Shocked that Bricker is going to vote McCain.

Next thing you know, Dio will be voting for Obama!

What a crazy world.

[John_Mace]

@woodstockbirdybird

yep - when i think of style and grace, i need look only to the op here to remind me what they mean.

P.s. U r dum.

lol!!!

[Hentor_the_Barbarian]

@Shodan

Of course he has. That’s why you resort to abuse.
Haven’t seen that one.

Of course, I’m not into gay porn.

Regards,
Shodan

Quoting a movie classic, I foolishly assumed you knew something of movies. Then again, you’re Shodan, who may or may not be a bot. So program this one in: “Forget it Jake, it’s Chinatown” is the classic last line to a classic Jack Nicholson movie. The Two Jakes was an ill-advised sequel that was eminently forgettable.

[Starving_Artist]

@ArizonaTeach

He wasn’t slamming you; he was responding to the fact that your post was quoted in an attack on him.

I’m not so sure. Take a look at posts #82 and #83, and see if you still feel that way.

Still, if Bricker agrees that no insult was intended, I’ll apologize and retract.

[woodstockbirdybird]

@John_Mace

lol!!!

How exactly did you fuck up the quote? “OP” isn’t capitalized, And “U” is, neither of which was the case in my original post.

[WF_Tomba]

@Bricker

I have realized something, thanks to this board.

I considered supporting and voting for Senator Obama, even though I disagree with him on most major issues and agree with Senator McCain on most of those same issues.

Why did I toy with this idea?

As I explained in a number of threads, it was because I was impressed – hell, blown away, more like it – by Senator Obama’s approach to campaigning. He had talked the talk, like every candidate does, about making it about the issues, but he was doing the nearly unprecedented walking the walk as well. He was keeping to the high road, even in the face of negative forays by his opponents (both Senators Clinton and McCain). I thought to myself, “If Obama can win doing this, it could transform how people in this country view campaigning!” That alone, I figured, was an issue, and it was fast becoming my ‘single issue’ and I was leaning towards being a single-issue voter.

The past few days and the Palin hysteria here (and in the larger blogosphere) have convinced me that I was an idiot to imagine such a thing. Despite Senator Obama’s calls (and actions!) to avoid such things, I see that the left has no intention of heeding this particular call to arms from their candidate. I see, further, the idea that the lesson of an Obama win will be that clean honest campaigning works would never be drawn.

So that settles it. Given that my only reason to support Obama is revealed now as a ridiculously naive pipe dream, it’s over.

Well, first of all I think you should vote for McCain if you agree with him on the issues. That’s the main reason I’m planning to vote for Obama.

Second, I think it’s illogical that although you considered voting for Obama because you like the way he’s campaigning, you gave up the idea because you don’t like the way other people who don’t take orders from Obama (“the left”) are behaving. The election isn’t between McCain and a bunch of liberal bloggers, or liberal Dopers. What would you think if someone said “I considered voting for McCain because I admire him as a person, but I decided not to because conservative Internet geeks were being such assholes”? Does that sound reasonable to you?

I’m voting McCain, you beeyotches! Thanks for making me see the light.

And when he wins, I am going to crow for a week. You think I crowed after 2000? I remember that, and I remember 2004 too, when you pussies whined about how shocked and hurt you were and begged me stop rubbing your pathetic faces in your loss. That will be a walk in the park compared to what’s coming up. I’ll fucking buy ad time on this board to crow about a McCain victory.

Now you’re just making yourself look like an arrogant dick.

[elucidator]

@Starving_Artist

…Still, if Bricker agrees that no insult was intended, I’ll apologize and retract.

Modesty demands, and honesty. I have a similar problem when I’m mistaken for George Clooney. How about you, when mistook for Wilford Brimley?

[Bricker]

@Starving_Artist

I’m not so sure. Take a look at posts #82 and #83, and see if you still feel that way.

Still, if Bricker agrees that no insult was intended, I’ll apologize and retract.

No insult intended at all, although given the ambiguity, no apology necessary either. But rest assured I wasn’t slamming you.

[Starving_Artist]

Thank you. I’m very glad to hear it.

[Hentor_the_Barbarian]

What a touchy and hypersensitive brand of Republican we seem to have here at the Dope. Not at all like the ruggedy, mavericky, independent, steely eyed, tough and emotionally aloof brand that you see on the teevee.

Please don’t hurt their feelings.

[Starving_Artist]

@elucidator

Modesty demands, and honesty. I have a similar problem when I’m mistaken for George Clooney. How about you, when mistook for Wilford Brimley?

Where ya been, luce? Stirring up trouble at the pubbie convention?

I’ve missed the smell of patchouli in the morning.

[WF_Tomba]

@Shodan

Obama sold himself as a new politician, who would bring a new way of campaigning. Now we have discovered that he isn’t much of a leader. He can’t even get his own followers to behave rationally. How can he be expected to unify the country if he can’t stop his own people from running out of control?

The idea that a politician should be able to “control” the people who support him in an election is ludicrous and offensive. The fact that Obama’s backers do not take direction from him is part of why I like the Democratic Party. It’s a shame more people don’t share his high-minded approach, but that’s life.

[Otto]

[quote=“Starving_Artist, post:114, topic:462002”]

And 2) The way the obviously biased leftie media is championed as being fair, objective and honest.
Is that the “obviously biased leftie media” that has been more critical of Obama than McCain by a 2.5 to 1 ratio?

@Los Angeles Times

The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University, where researchers have tracked network news content for two decades, found that ABC, NBC and CBS were tougher on Obama than on Republican John McCain during the first six weeks of the general-election campaign.

…

During the evening news, the majority of statements from reporters and anchors on all three networks are neutral, the center found. And when network news people ventured opinions in recent weeks, 28% of the statements were positive for Obama and 72% negative.

Network reporting also tilted against McCain, but far less dramatically, with 43% of the statements positive and 57% negative, according to the Washington-based media center.

…

The media center’s most recent batch of data covers nightly newscasts beginning June 8, the day after Hillary Rodham Clinton conceded the Democratic nomination, ushering in the start of the general-election campaign. The data ran through Monday, as Obama began his overseas trip.

@Starving Artist

conservative issues (Christianity, family values, attempts at social and economical engineering, etc.).

Because no one on the left side of the political spectrum is a Christian and no families on the left of the political spectrum have any values.

Keep barking the party line, Fido!

[Cervaise]

@Bricker

And when he wins, I am going to crow for a week. You think I crowed after 2000? I remember that, and I remember 2004 too, when you pussies whined about how shocked and hurt you were and begged me stop rubbing your pathetic faces in your loss. That will be a walk in the park compared to what’s coming up. I’ll fucking buy ad time on this board to crow about a McCain victory.

If Obama wins, I will not gloat, because I am a better human being than you are.

[Otto]

@Starving_Artist

I’ve missed the smell of patchouli in the morning.

Then pull your nose out of McCain’s fetid asshole.